Stiffness on vishnu key and wet+

[tomfoolery]

super curious about getting vishnu keys or wet+ I'm way 110lb wondering if you guys who ski them think I will still be able to butter them cuz buttering is way fun.

 

[Professor-Modelo]

Weigh* Def get wets or wet+ if you are only 110 and like doing butters

 

[steez_apprentice]

the farmville wormhole goes deeper

 

[hegleezy]

 

[SlitherySnake]

super curious about getting vishnu keys or wet+ I'm way 110lb wondering if you guys who ski them think I will still be able to butter them cuz buttering is way fun.

If you’re only 110 I wouldn’t worry about the plus or keys, I would get wet and if you want to hit some cliffs then wide

 

[hegleezy]

The wides would be difficult for him to ride. At 110lbs I’m assuming he’s shorter than 5’8 and probably pretty young. A 177/106 ski would be to much to control and challenging to maneuver.

If you’re only 110 I wouldn’t worry about the plus or keys, I would get wet and if you want to hit some cliffs then wide

 

[vroskii]

How tall are you?

super curious about getting vishnu keys or wet+ I'm way 110lb wondering if you guys who ski them think I will still be able to butter them cuz buttering is way fun.

 

[tomfoolery]

The wides would be difficult for him to ride. At 110lbs I’m assuming he’s shorter than 5’8 and probably pretty young. A 177/106 ski would be to much to control and challenging to maneuver.

im 5'9 and 15

((

 

[tomfoolery]

If you’re only 110 I wouldn’t worry about the plus or keys, I would get wet and if you want to hit some cliffs then wide

just worried about washing out on bigger hits, and I have all mountain/powder skis for cliffs

 

[SlitherySnake]

The wides would be difficult for him to ride. At 110lbs I’m assuming he’s shorter than 5’8 and probably pretty young. A 177/106 ski would be to much to control and challenging to maneuver.

im 5'9 and 15

((

just worried about washing out on bigger hits, and I have all mountain/powder skis for cliffs

yeah tbh i would vote 177 wide or wet + based on that info

 

[iphone18]

Wet + ?

wide questionable I would wait until get heavier and stop growing first just because it’s 106 wide

yeah tbh i would vote 177 wide or wet + based on that info

**This post was edited on Jan 19th 2023 at 4:05:16pm

 

[SlitherySnake]

Wet + ?

wide questionable I would wait until get heavier and stop growing first just because it’s 106 wide

**This post was edited on Jan 19th 2023 at 4:05:16pm

understandable, personally i ride wide 189’s and wet 189’s and while the wets are noticeably lighter (duh), they are also much lighter than a lot of skis with similar dimensions, and the wides are also incredibly light for their dimensions, so i feel like they both ride like they are much smaller skis, especially when it comes to swing weight because of how thin the tips and tails are.

i also love the wides because they are insanely smooth when you’re doing swaps and don’t want to jump around. they just kinda slide around on the rail like nobody’s business

that’s just my personal experience but yeah i totally get where you’re coming from

 

[iphone18]

understandable, personally i ride wide 189’s and wet 189’s and while the wets are noticeably lighter (duh), they are also much lighter than a lot of skis with similar dimensions, and the wides are also incredibly light for their dimensions, so i feel like they both ride like they are much smaller skis, especially when it comes to swing weight because of how thin the tips and tails are.

i also love the wides because they are insanely smooth when you’re doing swaps and don’t want to jump around. they just kinda slide around on the rail like nobody’s business

that’s just my personal experience but yeah i totally get where you’re coming from

Hell yeah, its just personal preference at this point