So I got $560 in tickets on my bicycle... traffic laywers?

KrazyistKarl

Active member
Saturday night, I leave a show after several drinks, but not enough to impair my motor skills enough to prevent me from riding my bike. Basically I'm accused of running two red lights and a stop sign while evading a bike cop.

I continue to bike around and I see a bike cop and he yells at me to get on the sidewalk, I enquirer what its about and he claims riding on the sidewalk, evading police and running red lights and stop signs. This is around 10 mins after I left my friends, riding on the sidewalk at walking speed along side them. As he is writing out the tickets he starts to look over my bike for any reason to give me more tickets, says I don't have reflectors, I point out that I have DOT and Transport Canada compliant reflective tape on both wheels as well as front and back, he nails me with a ticket for no headlight.

In my defense as far as evading him goes, I said how am I supposed to identify someone dressed in all black with a white light, and no red and or blue lights and I believe that's why he canceled the evading police ticket.

These tickets totaled $560 (more then that particular bike)AND the kicker is I actually get driver penalty points against my drivers license! 4 points for each red light. and each point costs 25 bucks come renewal time, as well as higher insurance premium ON MY MOTOR VEHICLE. So this will end up costing me over $1000

The possible loophole: Saskatoon bylaw #6884 references the highway traffic act then goes on to state in section 24 "except to the extent that they are inconsistent herewith, the relevant provisions of both the traffic bylaw and the highway traffic act are applicable to the operations of a bicycle in the city of Saskatoon" and section 23 of the bylaw states the breach of any provisions of this bylaw shall be set forth in schedule b hereto" and Schedule B in short, states that any infraction is subject to a $50 fine, with further reduction to $25 if paid within 14 days. So, these tickets I received should carry a maximum fine of $25.

One red light ticket will most definitely be thrown out in court as he sited a non existent criminal code, which almost proves incompetency as he wrote what was supposed to be two identical tickets (aside from being different lights)

As far as the definition of a vehicle goes, A bike is in fact a vehicle, so that brings me to my next point, the officer completely skipped the section for a vehicle description on the ticket. Why? does he feel that spot is only reserved for motor vehicles, well its not by definition. What is there to say it was not another cyclist who is guilty of the accused offenses?

There is just far too much grey area to blanket bicycles with all the rules and regulations of a motor vehicle. There is just no way to compare the two in terms of what equipment is needed on them, how they operate, government regulated standards for inspections, the lack of licensing and insurance, and even so far as to the complete lack of a "bicycle ed" course or a road cyclist test to make sure you are adequately trained to ride a bicycle as is the case when getting a drivers license.

sparknotes:outrun bike cops, get caught later, $560 dollars in tickets, found possible loophole in bylaws.
 
I'm from "BERTA", and Im guessing its similar to SASKABUSH. I've had to use traffic lawyers to get out of trouble before, they were able to help me out but I was in much more serious trouble. Long story short I was looking at loosing my licence and they saved my ass for $2200. I don't think you would need one in this case, It sounds like you are more than capable of representing yourself based on your research. I would focus on the lack of vehicle description a little more, I have heard a ton of stories of friends successfully fighting violations on technicalities (unfortunately but often DUI's). Honestly I bet the judge will significantly reduce the fines and especially reduce the demerits on your licence if you just explain the situation, "had a few drinks with friends, riding my bike home, not driving home pissed and shit".

Just my 2cents
 
I got a $520 ticket in Cali for riding through a red light. I went to court to try and get the charges reduced and the judge wouldnt budge an inch... dumb bitch. the worst part was all the kids in their were getting their marijuana charges reduced, while I got no sympathy.
 
Sue them for all kinds of stuff.

The bike laws are retarded. It's all about the money not the safety. It's pretty hard to hurt someone on a bike compared to in a car.

You can get a fucking dwi riding a bike home these days. The message that sends is that you're probably better off just driving a car if you can keep it between the yellow and white.

Even most of the traffic laws they enforce are $ oriented and have nothing to do with safety.

I don't get how riding a bike has anything to do with your license to operate a motor vehicle or your insurance for said vehicle. Maybe canada is her derping,

Fuck stupid laws. There's no way I would pay that shit.
 
13017918:theabortionator said:
You can get a fucking dwi riding a bike home these days.

No you cant... well at least not in MN. You need to be driving a motor vehicle to get a dui
 
13017929:.Hugo. said:
No you cant... well at least not in MN. You need to be driving a motor vehicle to get a dui

I really don't know what states have laws or how extreme they are it just seems a little ridiculous.

I haven't even ridden a bike in a decade. As long as you can still do a wheelie you should be free to go.
 
Can't speak in terms of Canadian laws, but here in the US, a bicycle is a vehicle in the eyes of the law. So follow the laws that a vehicle would. You do after all use the same roads, traffic lights, stop signs, etc, don't you? Just because you are on a bike doesn't mean that running a red light, a stop sign, or doing something else isn't illegal. People who constantly run red lights or stop signs are exactly why some motorists can't stand and are aggressive towards bicyclists.

You say there is "just far too much grey area to blanket bicycles with all the rules and regulations of a motor vehicle" - The licensing/regulating doesn't matter here. They each do have their own requirements, but assuming you meet these requirements in a car or on a bike, you need to operate you "vehicle" exactly the same in traffic. Having two sets of rules would be confusing and would cause the grey area you speak of. It is interesting that Idaho does have a law that allows bicyclists to proceed through stop signs if it is safe. (http://bikeleague.org/content/bike-law-university-idaho-stop)

Shitty to get so many tickets and for so much, hopefully you'll get some thrown out. You could maybe take a bicycling safety course prior to a court date and say you are taking proactive steps towards bicycling safer and ask that these tickets be thrown out or reduced. Depending on how drunk you were, you are lucky you didn't get a dwi. Everyone should keep in mind, in most areas, you can bike as drunk as you'd like so long as you do not break any traffic laws.
 
Bicyclists like you give the rest of us a bad name. If you are riding on the road you have the same rights and responsibilities as a motor vehicle.

However in my opinion thats a little high for something everyone does. so hopefully you can get some stuff dropped and ride the bike like youre supposed to next time.

I don't understand how those fines attach to your drivers license and car insurance as you don't need car insurance or a drivers license to ride your bike on the road. So what would happen if someone didnt have a drivers license or car insurance? how could those laws be applied to someone like that?
 
13018011:Tinga said:
I don't understand how those fines attach to your drivers license and car insurance as you don't need car insurance or a drivers license to ride your bike on the road. So what would happen if someone didnt have a drivers license or car insurance? how could those laws be applied to someone like that?

I got an underage drinking ticket in college while I was walking to a party. My insurance declared that a DUI. Go figure.
 
Oh Saskatoon... If I remember correctly, there is a huge population of cyclists there. If I also remember correctly, they are super tight on enforcing bylaws, especially downtown.

Where were you caught/ticketed?
 
13018011:Tinga said:
Bicyclists like you give the rest of us a bad name. If you are riding on the road you have the same rights and responsibilities as a motor vehicle.

That's retarded. If you're driving a car you're in control of something massively dangerous. On a bike? ummm no.

I'm not saying that you should be able to do whatever the fuck you want on a bike, just that treating them like they're the same is ridiculous.
 
13018087:theabortionator said:
That's retarded. If you're driving a car you're in control of something massively dangerous. On a bike? ummm no.

I'm not saying that you should be able to do whatever the fuck you want on a bike, just that treating them like they're the same is ridiculous.

it's for the sake of simplicity and safety. If everyone who is not on foot behaves the same way, it's easier.

what special exceptions do you think bicycles should have?
 
Whether driving, riding or walking I think one should always be focused on not impeding the flow of traffic. No matter what you're doing you shouldn't make someone react to your maneuver; you should be able to do it without fucking with anyone else's flow. That should be the laws of the road.... If everyone drove/rode/walked this way, I think things would be better.
 
13018087:theabortionator said:
That's retarded. If you're driving a car you're in control of something massively dangerous. On a bike? ummm no.

I'm not saying that you should be able to do whatever the fuck you want on a bike, just that treating them like they're the same is ridiculous.

As a user of a roadway though you still have the ability to cause an accident. Even if your bike cannot cause much damage to a car, what about the car that swerves to avoid you and hits a pedestrian? The car that rear ends that car as they slam on their brakes? The car that swerves into oncoming traffic?

The best way to make roads safer for those using them is to make vehicles (bikes and cars) as predictable as possible through a set of shared laws and expectations.
 
Petty laws like that fucking blow. I got a MIP type deal in VT walking home with a beer in my pocket. The tickets $300 and a 90 day license suspension for walking down the street with a closed beer in my pocket.

Cops blow I feel your pain
 
haha i don't think that would ever happen in whistler. the shit i see people get away with in this town in front of cops is ridiculous. You want to jay walk across the highway on your bike with no light or helmet at midnight in front of a cop? go ahead. riding on the sidewalk or trail is encouraged, but you can ride on the road if you want to to. that all said there are a lot of accidents with bikers and pedestrians here.
 
I hope you didn't give your drivers license over. You don't need a license to ride a bike so you can't get demerit points for doing something illegal on a bike.
 
Also even if he gave you demerit points they will 100% be retracted as they do not apply for bicycles at all.

The catch being if he left vehicle description blank and there's no way of telling that it's actually a bicycle looking at that specific ticket then you might not be able to get them taken off.

So lesson is always make sure 'bicycle' is clearly written in vehicle description when you get a ticket on a bicycle.
 
13018087:theabortionator said:
That's retarded. If you're driving a car you're in control of something massively dangerous. On a bike? ummm no.

I'm not saying that you should be able to do whatever the fuck you want on a bike, just that treating them like they're the same is ridiculous.

as a bicyclist and car driver it makes the most sense. cars should treat bikes like other cars. bikes should also follow the rules like cars. no more blowing stop signs and traffic lights. it creates consistency and dependability on both parties.
 
ACAB.

i run away from bike cops all the time. their little mountain bike things are no match for me. why would I stop to let the bastards take my money.

fuck cops. I hate them. I hope they die.
 
shit like this is so dumb. i understand why the law doesn't want you biking around drunk on busy roads and causing an accident, but its stupid that it's illegal to bike home drunk on quiet roads/sidewalk etc..

off the chain ridiculous that they always ask for your drivers licence, which you don't need to ride a bike. i got stopped once for not having a headlight when it wasn't even dark out yet (dusk). if anything like this ever happens to me again i'm just going to politely refuse to give them my licence if i have it on me.

not that i agree with most fines people get, but i agree they should be able to fine cyclists for certain dangerous things on busy roads like running reds or being drunk but only if you are riding on a major road. nonsense to get demerit points on your drivers licence though.
 
Back
Top