Snowplowing Controversy

As much as you dweebs want to make skiing out to be some beautiful form of self expression and ?art? it is still a sport at the end of the day. You still need incredible athletic prowess to do it at a level where companies will actually PAY YOU and you can either have a segment in a profitable movie or do well enough in competitions that you make income through prize winnings. I'm not sure who all needed to read that because I thought it was obvious but apparently not.
 
Wokeness and virtue signaling are more “in” in skiing than 6XL ever was, and rich white girls have been acting like idiots on Instagram for years now. These are just two unfortunate facts of life.

14326112:Skiblade420 said:
I don’t see how people don’t see how them pulling the race / gender card isn’t a big deal to the community.

They’re rich white girls who throw around serious terms to try and validate their shitty ideas. Thus detracting from actual race and gender inequality issues.

Honestly that is just a scummy type of person in my book, and should be checked.
Click to expand...
 
y’all are really thick if your missing the irony of calling them out for bringing hornbecks age/race into the situation while simultaneously bringing mckennas skiing ability into question when it’s equally irrelevant
 
14326355:Craw_Daddy said:
I literally never heard of her until a couple days ago. So no. Shes not a pro. Sounds like shes SPONSORED. Theres a big difference. A lot of those 12 yearolds are SPONSORED too. I would say the same thing about them if they were disrespectful too. Though, at least for them, I couldnt make the argument that I'm a better skier
Click to expand...

I never said she was a pro. That's why I put quotation marks on it. I just said she got free skis, aka being SPONSORED. My point was that a lot of your favorite skiers are also just SPONSORED, everyone loved Siver's recent edit and he's not a paid pro, 95% of everyone in zootspace is not a paid pro, and you wouldn't try and call them out for that.

No one cares if you claim you are a better skier than Mckenna (nevermind that in park skiing that is entirely subjective), being a SPONSORED skier is not about whether you can do one more 180 than someone, it's about whether you can work with a brand to create content to promote their product. Mckenna does that, you don't and probably couldn't. I'd much rather watch a video of her doing a straight air shifty with style than some random hucking something.

No one is disrespecting Mike, people are allowed to have different opinions and disagree on stuff. Hell, Mike is one of my favorite skiers of all time and I'm pretty neutral in this debate, I just think you shitting on female skiers is not good for the discourse.

Being good at skiing =/= being right in an online debate
 
14326393:a_burger said:
y’all are really thick if your missing the irony of calling them out for bringing hornbecks age/race into the situation while simultaneously bringing mckennas skiing ability into question when it’s equally irrelevant
Click to expand...

Really? Skiing ability is irrelevant when discussing someones take on a COMMENT ABOUT SKIING?! I'm pretty sure that is the MOST RELEVANT thing to look at. ACTUAL pro skiers tend to ACTUALLY be good at skiing. Ones status as a pro is indicative of their experience with the ski community. A pro skier has gone to trade shows, gone to movie premieres, represented a brand, talked to thousands of people about skiing. They would know, better than just about anyone, what is and isn't tactful when discussing their sport. And since skiing ability is what separates the pros from the rest of us, I'd say it's a pretty relevant part of the discussion.
 
14326397:Craw_Daddy said:
Really? Skiing ability is irrelevant when discussing someones take on a COMMENT ABOUT SKIING?! I'm pretty sure that is the MOST RELEVANT thing to look at. ACTUAL pro skiers tend to ACTUALLY be good at skiing. Ones status as a pro is indicative of their experience with the ski community. A pro skier has gone to trade shows, gone to movie premieres, represented a brand, talked to thousands of people about skiing. They would know, better than just about anyone, what is and isn't tactful when discussing their sport. And since skiing ability is what separates the pros from the rest of us, I'd say it's a pretty relevant part of the discussion.
Click to expand...

Well yeah we already covered that you suck at skiing yourself on the first page, so if it’s so important stfu noob go sit and whine in your pile of downvotes
 
14326409:a_burger said:
Well yeah we already covered that you suck at skiing yourself on the first page, so if it’s so important stfu noob go sit and whine in your pile of downvotes
Click to expand...

Hey dumbass, I wasnt the one grandstanding on Instagram about an innocuous skiing comment. If I ever do that then please by all means call me out! Also from what I've seen in your videos I'd skunk your ass in a game a slvsh.
 
If you are still commenting on this post and have posts in the first page, yall have gone too far. Go take your L and get over it..

Hornbeck was not trying to be a gatekeeper.. It was a misunderstanding. Ya'll are going to see Michael Jordan telling someone how to better their jumpshot and take it as GATEKEEPING? "ah well everyone should be able to play bball no matter their ability level, and this is not welcoming to the sport." lol.. SMH! I actually have always liked Mckennas skiing on IG, but she definitely comes off as basic after making a big deal out of something like that..
 
boy-that-escalated-quickly.jpg
 
Gattamn that’s a lotta comments for 2 days. I ain’t reading them.

Look I think it’s a bit gatekeeper-y myself but I think many of us are missing the message. He’s talking more about flowing through the park, coming up behind someone and then they speed check and it totally messes your speed and you hit them/have to bail.

That happened to me so many times last year. I get it. I don’t think it was so much the snow plow as much as the speed check.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top