Skrillex is fake?

skrillex sucks. he rarely does live mixes and he ones he does suck. he has an entire album dedicated to remixing his own songs. his old screamo band sucked, his new electro act thing sucks.
 
Holy Hipster Cat, Batman!

Get off your fucking high horse. My homie's dad is one of the most "musically inclined" people I know. Has played in numerous Blues and Jazz bands throughout his years and is consistently making new music. Wanna know who he's really diggin right now at the ripe old age of 56?

Thats right, Skrillex.
 
you're an idiot. watch the video runningman posted and tell me thats not a "collaboration"

col·lab·o·rate (k
schwa.gif
-l
abreve.gif
b
prime.gif
schwa.gif
-r
amacr.gif
t
lprime.gif
)intr.v. col·lab·o·rat·ed, col·lab·o·rat·ing, col·lab·o·rates1. To work together, especially in a joint intellectual effort
 
Ahh the youth of today..

Spewing utter bullshit out of their mouths every opportunity they get.

 
Either you're saying we dislike Skrillex for no reason other than to be mean, or you're calling us hipsters?

I hate dubstep (and most of hip hop) because it appeals to philistines. There's literally zero sense of subtlety in any of it, and it's all based around the concept of copy/pasting bars from the previous measure and tweaking them slightly (as opposed to playing the whole section manually), which makes it painfully obvious that you're hearing the exact same recording being repeated. It pretty much takes out all of the wild characteristics that give real music that extra something and replaces it with LOUD NOISES so that the musically illiterate can actually feel like they understand how to dissect sound the way an actual musician does.

Listen to a Pink Floyd album and what do you hear? Stereoscopic condenser mics in a carpeted studio; the rattling of the wooden speaker cabinets; rotating quadraphonic sound projection; room acoustics; even the tremolo claw smacking against the wooden grain as Gilmour taps the vibrato. What do you hear with Skrillex? A bunch of sloppy filters applied to dry-recorded tritone scales. You would have to be literally musically retarded to think there's an ounce of musical depth in any of this.
 
you know not what you talk about. seems to me you aren't musically inclined in the slightest.

dubstep, when done right, is just as enjoyable to many many incredibly musically gifted people.

I find it's one's ability to find true music in any genre that really separates a musician above someone who just plays music.

It's musical close-mindedness that sinks your ship; any great musician, such as Zappa, will be able to listen to a piece of music (even if they detest that genre) and be able to tell why it appeals to others and recognize the skill needed to compose/perform it.

I realize the button pressing and sampling (like Girl Talk for example) aren't good examples of instrumental or compositional skill, but they still have a different kind of musical talent that not many can do and make sound really good. It seems like people who make decent dubstep are a dime a dozen, but I'm under the impression that's because you can make it on your laptop with a free piece of software and upload a good quality version to the internet without a recording studio etc etc.

I like to compare it to a painter doing a mozaic. The artist will use all little pieces of broken tile or ceramic that came from previous works of art and create something new and beautiful with it.

Open your mind to music; it doesn't mean you need to like it.
 
if it was back stage i would say yes if it was behind the crowd viewing the stage they might have been doing the lights.
 
that would make sense if the doors were still a band. But in case you missed it Jim Morrison died 40 years ago.
 
I'm guessing what you thought were the actual DJs were really just the guys controlling the lights. They had the setlist in front of them so they'd know which cues to send, and when. Spooky Tings was my 4th time seeing Skrillex, and as an amateur DJ myself, I can honestly say that what you heard was indeed Skrillex. As far as his apparent lack of turntablism, the style of mixing (or lack thereof) that he employs doesn't necessarily require turntables. He probably pre-recorded the set and then added the effects, etc. live on stage.
p.s. Nadastrom fuckin killed his set, even though it was only like 20 mins.
 
the thing is, with your inclusion of hip-hop (i might just be fucking up on my distinction between hip hop and rap) you sound extremely ignorant, because IMO hip hop is more about word play and lyrics than the actual beat of the song
 
If music sounds good to me, I like it

If it doesn't, I don't like it, but I am not a dick about it and don't hate on it.

Woo hoo
 
too high for this. when it comes down to it, everyone has a different taste in music. people are gonna like what they're gonna like
 
That's exactly what I did. I was open to dubstep at first, gave it a careful examination, and arrived at my conclusion that it is indeed shit. I'm not saying people aren't allowed to like it. I'm just sick of dubstep fans saying my reasons for disliking a genre are unjustified.
 
in my humble opinion, if your "instrument" can also be used to look up snuff porn and watch videos of japanese girls eating shit out of eachothers' vaginas, you're not a fucking musician. but hey, tomato tomahto.
 
hope your not talking about the halloween show at the 1st bank center. everyone iv talked to that went agrees it was the worst. set. ever. they basically screamed into the mics the whole set, with MAYBE 2 minutes of good music. although they did say they had equipment problems.
 
That's probably why I think a lot of it sucks since I don't give a fuck about poetry. I've always been under the impression that rap was more lyric-oriented while hip-hop was more musical, which is why I hate rap altogether.

I will say that Death Row, Wu-Tang, and others with the funk/jazz flavor are fucking awesome. However, I can only respect them to a certain degree because their beats are 80% samples of funk/soul artists who were far more talented than they were (save RZA, who's just a goddamn boss).
 


fuck yea

It's hard to imagine someone being all into music and not liking poetry. Lyrical songs are poems with a beat, to put it simply.

I get the impression that you think any type of music you find horrible isn't good music.
 
because after an 8 hour car ride to denver with some buddies and getting the biggest fucking headache of my life from listening to Skrillex almost exclusively, i realized his ploy to destroy humanity
 
How is that hard to imagine? I come from a classical background. Do you think history's famous composers were primarily concerned with lyrics? No, they were supplementary to the actual music.

Lyrical songs are "poems with a beat" if you are focusing primarily on the lyrics. To me lyrics are unnecessary and irrelevant to the music itself, which is why I prefer instrumental music.

I just happen to be able to articulate exactly what I don't like about certain types of music and why I dismiss them. Just because I personally find certain music to be horrible doesn't mean I'm saying it's an invalid form of expression, nor am I saying people don't have the right to enjoy the music. I'm just explaining my rationalé to demonstrate that I'm not just "hating" (which doesn't make any sense anyway).
 
For instance, I could identify any given note, chord, guitar make/model, wood, pickups, amplifier, tuning, etc. on my favorite album, but I couldn't possibly recite a single line of its lyrics. And I've listened to probably a thousand times by now.
 
i wish i was sonny/skrillex and so do every single one of you.

he makes more money in a year than everyone in this thread ever will put together AND people THINK he makes great music.
 
..and you believe that?

this past year he played just about every major festival under the sun and currently he's playing a tour that has SOLD OUT at 95% of the stops. there is absolutely no way he isn't rolling in the dough.
 
And I'm supposed to take your word over his? Right.

Being famous doesn't automatically equate to wealth. You'd be surprised how many famous people don't have nearly as much money as everyone would think.
 
http://www.celebritynetworth.com/richest-celebrities/skrillex-net-worth/

honestly you can only trust a site like that as far as you can throw it, but it is something.

lets take the skrillex show i just went to for example:

$42+fees for tickets.

X

7,500 tickets sold

=

$315,000 in ticket sales alone, plus merch sold at the show...

obviously he isn't bagging 315k himself, there are countless cost that go in to making that show run; but i saw that someone said he was making $3,000 a show...there is no way in hell he's making that little. probably more like $3k a song.
 


Perhaps it was an old interview...on a side note is $2.5 million even considered rich in L.A. anymore?

But really, just because people don't like him doesn't mean they're jealous. It just means...they don't like him? Everyone has their reasons (some more justifiable than others).
 
Me too, but based on my experience in L.A. it really isn't "rich."

And I agree; I have nothing against him personally. I just think his music is horrendous and I'm tired of his fans making reactive comments like "you're just a hater" or "you're just jealous."
 
He is homeless, funny fact

skrillex doesn't make that much, but everything is covered for him where ever he goes. Spencer, the most money from ticket sales from a show go to the venue that had to pay to book the artist, that money goes to their management/record label, and a cut of it goes to the artist.

you want a DJ that makes a lot of money, look at armin. he charges $150k+ for a 2 hour set
 
He is not homeless he has a dope apartment in downtown and by L.A. standards he's well off but not rich here your not rich until you got 8 figures in the bank. But still 2.5 to have time of your life... sign me up.
 
i said at least 3k. Thats minimum. You have to understand that there are a few hands that get at what the venue pays before him. still 3Gs for 2 hours of flailing around and pressing buttons. Top it off with the fact that only a fraction, maybe none, of his touring and accom expenses come out of that 3 grand, thats just ''spending' money.
 
lol skrillex is too mainstream, he can suck and people will still like him, just cuz he had 2 hit songs.
 
I enjoy skrillex's music, but I'm not musically inclined so I can't speak for the quality of his songs. Many of them are catchy the drops are explosive and his sets are super energetic. Hes one of the 'icons' or figureheads of dubstep which is blowing up everybody knows him and the songs sound good, perfect recipe for a mainstream star.

In terms of money I'd say hes gotta be doing pretty well. Like above the show brings in $300k+ if another artist is profiting 150k+ I'll argue a huge name like skrillex can at least pull 1% of the profits from his own show. I also know in terms of spending he gets a ton of shit comped for him (alcohol, food, etc). He's lined up to play over a set a day for the next year. Ill bet he lives in a pretty pimp RV, has little quality of life costs and all his money goes to what he wants to spend it on.
 
lol you have no clue. He's probably making $50,000-$70,000 a show, probably even more. to give perspective, deadmau5's minimum is $100,000 a show
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top