14403051:switchlip2 said:
14403115:Logi said:
14403151:Celery said:What happened to those topsheets?
14403151:Celery said:What happened to those topsheets?


14403231:Logi said:Got ‘em used from someone in Minnesota. For some reason he painted the top sheets this grey color, but didn’t properly seal the paint, so I just took some nail polish remover to it and got most of it off then gave up when it looked like what they look like now.
This is what they looked like before:
View attachment 1033490
View attachment 1033491
I think he painted the bottoms too because they are cleaner now
14403120:BradFiAusNzCoCa said:
14403453:BingPow said:these look beast
14403057:Quaggy said:
14405843:isaacwrong said:some clapped tf out royales, purchased off localssale for $45, slapped some fks on em. Delam in both tips, about 22 edge cracks and 1 inch of edge missing underfoot
View attachment 1034264
14405850:EBrookski said:those are my fav skis ive ever skied, i use them now with the same graphic, i got them new, but i got the last pair so ive only had em about a year, im curious what you think of them compared to other skis you have, i think that the tails are very soft and that the noses are a mid soft flex, but these are def way more flexy than a ton of other skis
14405855:isaacwrong said:NS is going to give me some shit lmao. They're 180's which are a bit big for me. I'm sitting a 5'6" 140. I've got a pair of give'rs in 174 that are my main whip. Trying to get my hands on some 172 royales, I like the 90mm width for edge control on groomers and rails. They seem to be a bit stiffer than a wet/wide, which I've found to be a straight noodle. Might be due to the excessive early rise compared to surface's
14403120:BradFiAusNzCoCa said:
14405941:Slowbro said:I really wanted to try these back in the day, how do you like them?