Should bobby brown have one?

in the New Zealand Open Slopstyle bobby brown came first over wallisch and harlaut

as i watched the vid of the event at the bottom of the ns article

i found that bobbys run was more sloppy.

his arms were all over on the landings

and wat he threw down i found wasnt as technical than wallischs or harlaut.

no direspect to you bobby your a great skier

but i dont think you should of one that event persanoly

what does everyone think???
 
learn to spell before making retarded threads. They judge differently down under i guess. If tom wallisch WON every single competition there would be no such thing as competition...duh
 
that was a freestyle event? the top two were the same run, the rodeo off the rail looked exactly the same, they both did shitty tail grab 9s, and the same steeze stealin trick from last year, leave that to PK, he does it best anyway. tom and bobby should be dequaled for making our sport look like an FIS sanctioned aerialwannabe shit show.

if every post was ruined by trolls caring about spelling, oh wait, duh, they are. care about skiing, and nothing else, your life will be better.
 
Personaly i thought that bobby brown should have got third. Dont mean to hate i mean the kids amazing but i still thinks his run was a little sloppy. Just needs to tighten up some landings and his arm movements. Guess i liked Herik Harlauts and Wallisch's runs better. Those are the only 3 I seen though. Just watched the podium runs.
 
idk, was t walls swap pretzel 2 out was a better trick than the switch 4 on. not that either one is any harder, but its more of a rail trick compared to a switch 4 on turns it more into a jump type feature. I mean a switch 4 on is dope, but having switch ups and pretzels shows alot more diversity. browns run = spin, flip, spin, spin, double T walls run = rail trick, flip, spin, spin, double. just thoughts i don't know what to think.
 
Its difficult to judge a competition as close as that. You gotta look at everything from beginning to the end, and the judges aren't given that much time to decide on a score. Regardless, I'd take a poked nose mute double 10 over a double 12 nearly binding grabbed mute.
 
did nobody notice that wallisch landed his double worse than bobby? wallisch's hands made contact with the snow because he landed too far forward. thats one reason bobby came out on top. plus his grabs were held longer.

the only thing i liked in wallisch's run more was the bs swap pretzel 2 out. other than that, they were identical except wallisch didnt stomp his double completely
 
i like how you dont know the basic english word "WIN", or the past tense form "WON".

good luck with school
 
i am still in school

i speel great at skool i dont bother when i am not there

and i get 85 or more on my essays

and its pretty stupid i find that thats why i loose karma for my speelin

sure this is a fail for spellin

but i dont care cause i am not getting graded
 
bobby b deserved it. It's hard to compare their styles though. I might be wrong but bobby seems like he's a bit taller than wallisch so that factors into everything. The real clincher was the last hit. Sure Tom did a 12, but he landed pretty rough and his grab was right in front of his binding. Bobby laid his double 10 out and his nose grab was so big his last name should be chaned to brownstein. It all boils down to the classic switch 10 debate. a double 12 is the new switch 10, and bobby's double 10 is the new PK switch 9 high mute.
 
Bobby stuck all his tricks much better than Tom. He plain old stomped everything like it was nothing, Tom was a little wobbly. That is why Bobby won.
 
sorry, i forgot how sensitive everyone is toward wallnuts. i wasnt hating on anything other than the fact that they were doing the same run. i mean our sport is supposed to be freestyle, so if you leave a decision up to the judges, you already lost in my eyes.

and wallnuts double hand slapped the lander, tskilz would award no points for any hands down.
 
every troll that hated on you is jealous that they have never made a thread worthy of a real discussion. keep making threads with good content and youll never have to worry about karma eating trolls.
 
rant

Get off Tom Wallisch and Henrik Harlaut's nuts. Just because you think that they are "cooler" than Bobby Brown doesn't mean they should win. Wallisch's double landing obviously was worse than Bobby's and therefore he lost points and Bobby came out on top.

/rant

 
Bobby's landings weren't sketchy at all. Wallisch put both hands down on the landing on the last jump. And in my mind a forward double 10 is more technical than a double 12. He grabbed mute nose on it, and held the grab and stomped.
 
taking into consideration that rails dont matter (except cannons) in competition, they did pretty much the same run and

1-wallisch didnt have a competition caliber landing on his 12

2-brown held a nice grab through his double
 
ill trust the opinion of the guy who stomps both (^) over the borderline retarded kid who started this.

PS - your run at remarks was the dankness
 
yeah, I gotta say I would like to see some more trick variation, but it's more the judging than the athletes that dictate the same run, which is the most technical thing the athletes can do given the course. It's easier for the judges to arbitrate who has the best double cork based on a few set variables than to decide between two completely different tricks where there is a lot more thinking involved. Wallisch put his hands down on the landing, so bam: points gone. Also I think bobby Brown was smart to just do the double cork 10, because he was able to hold the grab longer and stomp the landing better. If they could just go ahead and be creative instead of doing whatever they could to win for their sponsors and the cheque, I have no doubt those guys (and girls) would do it instead of throwing the same super tech high risk tricks as all the others, because I think that would be discouraging as an athlete. This is why movies and edits are so much better than comps. The skiers don't have to "win", they just want to produce the coolest segment they can that will be entertaining; fun to watch.

To play "devil's advocate", it could be helpful watching everyone do double corks/flips/same trick, because then someone looking to learn those tricks sees all the unique little tweaks and movements that each athlete does, which gives a more complete understanding of the trick. The individual is in the detail. Also, this way, judging is toward perfection of the trick, so it cuts down on sloppiness, and forces the athletes to be better skiers, because it makes sense that whoever has the best execution of the trick has the best stance and movement, so it does push the sport, just on a very minute level toward perfection, which of course is impossible to achieve, but damn it we try hard.
 
It was probably already said, but

Bobby Brown should have one what? One chocolate bar? One pair of skis?
 
Hey Bellevee4 or whatever-
SHUT THE FUCK UP!! - I mean that from the bottom of my heart.

(Sorry for the cussing, but to come online and be so impolite about somebody's performance is low, and his spelling blew dick. I remember when I was 11 years old.)
 
One what? A beer? Yeah sure, he can have one legally down there. I'd buy him a case for that win, but I think I have to wait another 4 years.
 
true. but wallisch's was definitly styly too, and fairly technical he messed up the landing on his last jump but the first double wallisch threw in the comp video was stomped
 
Back
Top