SCOTT P4 or LINE ELIZEBETH

[sander_h]

i am gettin ski for powder and all around whick ski would suit me better?

 

[Ryno]

Im getting really sick of this

https://www.newschoolers.com/web/forums/readthread/thread_id/239949/

 

[bikerocker]

scott skis have better bases, but i really like how the line's are shaped, they'll probably be a better all around ski cuz they carve a lot differently. The scotts are great for mach 1 adventures, and they are fat enough for anything, period. they also rock in big park, so it depends on how you ski, you should easily be able to get p4s for under 600 too.

 

[bikerocker]

yeah sorry for aiding in the delinquancy here.

 

[fouldsys]

its a shame too. hes been here for 2 years

 

[sander_h]

5ft 6in 115lbs i ski pretty good, mostly natural hits cliffs steeps pow

 

[spiketon]

i've got the elizabeths and have skiied on them once so far i dont really know yet cause they feel wierd and the tips sink in the powder but it could be just my binding setup - dead center - and they are pretty stiff for a powder ski, its real easy to stomp big shit in pow cause they're unholingly fat

 

[BigJew]

What? Stiff? They're soo soft its' ridiculous. And mounting them dead center was a bad move on your part.

 

[Peach.]

sorry i had to say this LIZZIES!!!!!!

 

[powfoka]

totally different skis but because of your size i say lizzies

 

[CHARLES.BRONSON]

no its not, theyre more symmetrical than 90 percent of park skis out there. 1cm back is ideal on them

604 CRUNK IS BOSS OF THE BOSS

 

[rxvcgiii]

That is the first time, in the history of Line Elizabeths, that anybody has described them as "stiff".

 

[NmTAOSskier]

goto go with the p4's. i have heard nothing but great things about them from the shops. cant wait till next year i know there will be lots of 191 left