Rossignol Slat

I just got the 168. I have not rode them yet but they are kinda heavy i noticed. Thats the only down side. They are super flex and have the perfect amount of rocker in my opinion. They will probably be very buttery and fun though so I'm stoked to ride them
 
13342107:geib said:
I just got the 168. I have not rode them yet but they are kinda heavy i noticed. Thats the only down side. They are super flex and have the perfect amount of rocker in my opinion. They will probably be very buttery and fun though so I'm stoked to ride them
Click to expand...

yeah i found a place were i can get em for 170 bucks so i think i will pull the trigger
 
I love this ski. I have 6 skis and this is my go to. It's great everywhere.

Just make sure you put an orange binding on it.

#OBC
 
13342929:freeski1620 said:
I love this ski. I have 6 skis and this is my go to. It's great everywhere.

Just make sure you put an orange binding on it.

#OBC
Click to expand...

sick i have heard they r heavy, would you agree ?
 
13343010:geib said:
Get em, the swing weight is low from what i heard but the overall weight is kinda heavy but not that bad
Click to expand...

sick and just one more question what is the break width on them
 
I have the 174 and they are pretty nice. Super buttery and jibby. Good for charging and carving too. Nice on landings, decent pop on take offs too. What did you guys mount at? I did mine at -3 and I want to move them up for a little more balance in the air.
 
13343614:geib said:
I will probably get 100 to 110 brake width. And i will mount them probably at -1 or center because i pretty much mainly do park.
Click to expand...

I wouldnt do center because they aren't a symmetrical ski. The tip has more rocker than the tail too. I have been contemplating where remount mine, either -1 or -2. They have a line at -2 but I am intrigued on how far forward they can be mounted forward with no substantial performance tradeoffs. I have 100mm brakes and they're fine.
 
13343618:Aftergurner said:
I wouldnt do center because they aren't a symmetrical ski. The tip has more rocker than the tail too. I have been contemplating where remount mine, either -1 or -2. They have a line at -2 but I am intrigued on how far forward they can be mounted forward with no substantial performance tradeoffs. I have 100mm brakes and they're fine.
Click to expand...

Oh ya your right thanks. Ill probably do -1 then. maybe -2 but i really want the most balance i can get.
 
13343624:geib said:
Oh ya your right thanks. Ill probably do -1 then. maybe -2 but i really want the most balance i can get.
Click to expand...

Yeah same. It of sucks that not alot of people seem to have this ski. I can barely find anything about mounting recommendation.
 
13343388:Aftergurner said:
I used 100mm brakes. They work pretty well as they are 97 underfoot I believe. What are you using for bindings?
Click to expand...

i have fks now and they r on armada ar7s would/could i just get new brakes?
 
13344454:yeahmon said:
i have fks now and they r on armada ar7s would/could i just get new brakes?
Click to expand...

Im pretty sure you could probably just order new brakes in a bigger size. Brakes dont seem like they would be that hard to swap.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top