Rossignol S3 - east coast??

seward

Active member
alright. im torn between skis.

i know i want something between 85-100mm waist, 170-180cm in length. ive previously skied pocket rockets, big troubles, and lords within those requirements.

seems like almost every ski with a 90+ mm waist now has some sort of rocker or early tip/tail rise.

only ski ive been on with any sort of rocker is the lord, however it is only 210mm on the tip, hardly a rocker, and to be dead honest i didnt notice much of a difference.

i do most of my skiing in ontario, 40cm is considered mind blowing. i have anthems to take care of my park needs. so i am looking for something all-mountain specific. crud, tree's, groomers, occasional 20-30cm snowfall "pow" if you will.

occasionally i hit up the real east-coast with annual and sometimes multiple trips to quebec and vermont resorts, and normally take a annual trip out west to do some real skiing.

im 5'8, about a buck75lbs, pretty good skier if i may toot my own horn, like to giver pretty hard.

i prefer softer more jibby skis then stiff ass planks.

so, my question to you newschoolers, is what skis should i buy? ive done alot of reasearch and im going to buy off-season for its financial perks.

im really like the rossignol s3, probably my number one pick right meow.

also digging the chronic blend, although i cant find anything on exactly how much rocker it has tip and tail, even the line website says 15mm tail rocker, which makes no fucking sense to me, so i hope its a typo on their part.

do i really need a rockered ski for where and how i ski? or do the s3 and blend have little enough rocker that i would be fine, its not like either of them are hellbent bent.

any suggestions anyone? im struggling with this one

 
Chronics are super stiff skis. Look into line blends. they're 100 underfoot and pretty playful but will definitely handle what ontario and the eastcoast throws at you
 
my mistake.

i meant blends, not too sure why i put chronic in there. had the original chronics, hated them.

everything i heard about the blend is good, less rocker then the s3 too
 
i was thinking about the blends among some other skis when i got new skis this winter. i decided against the blends because i heard a lot about them being too soft to be a good charging ski (and idk i'm not sold on line's materials/construction etc). for what it's worth, i decided on the armada ARVs and love them. but i also heard lots and lots of great things about the rossis along the way

just my 2 cents
 
s3's were the best skis I have ever been on. They could rail turns, were nimble in the trees, and floated so much for their size. I regret not buying them. I am a type 3 skier, 6 foot 5 inches, and 250 pounds. I had 186's
 
For the right skier, K2 extremes can charge east coast all mountain. I ski them as all mountain/park in the CO, and am always charging!
 
Back
Top