blueberrypaladin
Member
Sick to see ON3P adding a new rocker profile to their platform - has anyone been on it? I know they’re mostly focused on edge hold and camber, I wonder if it’ll change stance preference as well.
14618204:weatcoast said:Dam it only took on3p 20 years to realize that heavily rockered skis suck for anything but those 5 days of powder we all get per season.
14618158:muffMan. said:Saw some videos, but no reviews. Honestly so hyped for it.
I probably will keep the normal shape, but interested in a woodsman ripper as a freeride chargy ski. Cool they are adding new shapes and experimenting
14618241:Kyguyy said:Real question: I wanna size up to 181 jeff 92, but after seeing more edge contact, should I stay with 176?
14618212:KalmarJalmar said:Jeffrey 108 with the ripper could be my cup of tea, I enjoy carving so camber is always welcome in my skis. With the price tag I will rather stay with my wooden skis though.
14618361:KimJongTrill said:I have a custom ripper 108 inbound. Will report back.
14618361:KimJongTrill said:I have a custom ripper 108 inbound. Will report back.
14618390:weatcoast said:Good job wasting money on a normal camber ski that you could have bought for 1/3 the price from any other manufacturer
14618390:weatcoast said:Good job wasting money on a normal camber ski that you could have bought for 1/3 the price from any other manufacturer
14618412:tyauer said:Unbelievably tragic that the wrenegade got taken away before ripper rocker. Ripper rocker wren ti’s would’ve had me straight lining Headwall real nice
14618469:mattytru said:While it's undoubtably humorous that they have just added a standard camber profile option to their skis, it's still a good call. Camber is usually a good thing for anyone who doesn't ski fresh snow 100% of the time.
Once the new profile has been around for a little while I'll be excited to come across a used pair and try em out. I know they will ski like most other mid fat lightly rockered freestyle skis but their construction is solid and I wouldn't mind continuing to support them.
14618477:Voyage86 said:I don’t think you are supporting them if you buy second hand used..
14618554:mattytru said:hah, valid point.
i've been pretty vocal to anyone i ski with about my positive experience on on3ps though and have definitely influenced others to buy so i think it still helps them.
i never buy skis new because i'm not loaded. does support come purely from buying gear new from a company? does positive word of mouth influence count? seems to imply you have to be rich to matter.
14618561:weatcoast said:If you think people need to be rich to afford $500 skis you’re either retarded or 14 years old. Probably both.
**This post was edited on Jul 11th 2024 at 8:08:10pm
14618477:Voyage86 said:I don’t think you are supporting them if you buy second hand used..
14619212:KimJongTrill said:For science. 100 ripper vs regular 110.
View attachment 1094932
View attachment 1094933
View attachment 1094934
14619755:Vzx said:Has anyone tried them on snow yet? if so how were there.
14621342:weatcoast said:We’re in the middle of summer, sport.
14621345:KimJongTrill said:Custom sale my guy.
14621342:weatcoast said:We’re in the middle of summer, sport.
14625172:zack1416 said:Hey, I am probably one of few people who has skied the new rocker, on a pair of Jeffrey 100s. I don’t have a much experience on ON3P skis meaning can’t compare them to their previous rocker.
This was on thin early season conditions, a mix of groomers and crud, but not icy.
Honestly they were among the funnest skis I’ve ever been on. Great edge control and very poppy, and among the most responsive skis I’ve ever strapped to my feet. I felt a lot of confidence whether carving on groomers, charging in the crud, or just doing small jibs.
I’m about to put an order in as I tested a few different skis last year and these were by far my favorite.
14625196:NSCrip69 said:ON3P marketing department strikes again