No on3p ski reviews?

[erased]

Yo so why tf can i not find a single mango 90 review on youtube.

 

[Schoess]

Here's your review. They absolutely rip, they are durable, tons of rocker but not "soft". The skis hook up really well when you lean them over and don't chatter on big jumps. Lighter than the 100 obviously, so perfect if you're a big techy boii on the railz. If you live in the mountains or are not Andreas Hatveit I would highly recommend the 100 because of the fun factor and it dealing with chop a bit better, however you can't go wrong either way. IMHO most major manufacturer's skis are built to the same(ish) quality (poop water). I've been riding ON3P's exclusively since 2017ish? And I don't see why I would stop anytime soon

 

[Vzx]

Here's your review. They absolutely rip, they are durable, tons of rocker but not "soft". The skis hook up really well when you lean them over and don't chatter on big jumps. Lighter than the 100 obviously, so perfect if you're a big techy boii on the railz. If you live in the mountains or are not Andreas Hatveit I would highly recommend the 100 because of the fun factor and it dealing with chop a bit better, however you can't go wrong either way. IMHO most major manufacturer's skis are built to the same(ish) quality (poop water). I've been riding ON3P's exclusively since 2017ish? And I don't see why I would stop anytime soon

Thanks for the review thinking about getting mango 100s next season.

 

[Vzx]

Yo so why tf can i not find a single mango 90 review on youtube.

If you are interested in the Mango 100s [tag=253070]@TAS[/tag] Made a good review on how they

perform on all parts of the mountain.

 

[Yukon_Cornelius]

Here’s another review they’re fucking dope

 

[weatcoast]

Too heavy imo. Sold my mango 100’s after five days. I’d rather use a lighter but less durable ski. All manufacturers use the same 2.5 edge anyway and that’s the breaking point in my experience, so having a heavier and thicker sidewall adds no value for me since the edge is the thing that breaks first.I also think their durability is overrated because any manufacturer can make a durable ski if they don’t care about weight, like the K2 poacher is a similar case.

**This post was edited on Apr 11th 2024 at 2:05:44pm

 

[Celery]

Too heavy imo. Sold my mango 100’s after five days. I’d rather use a lighter but less durable ski. All manufacturers use the same 2.5 edge anyway and that’s the breaking point in my experience, so having a heavier and thicker sidewall adds no value for me since the edge is the thing that breaks first.I also think their durability is overrated because any manufacturer can make a durable ski if they don’t care about weight, like the K2 poacher is a similar case.

**This post was edited on Apr 11th 2024 at 2:05:44pm

Sounds to me like you need to go to the gym, they aren't very heavy.

 

[weatcoast]

1900g per ski on a 176cm mango 100 is pretty significant compared to 1700g on similar park skis, it adds up. They are literally one of the heaviest park skis on the market next to the k2 Poacher.

Sounds to me like you need to go to the gym, they aren't very heavy.

**This post was edited on Apr 11th 2024 at 2:56:17pm

 

[BallClapper]

Too heavy imo. Sold my mango 100’s after five days. I’d rather use a lighter but less durable ski. All manufacturers use the same 2.5 edge anyway and that’s the breaking point in my experience, so having a heavier and thicker sidewall adds no value for me since the edge is the thing that breaks first.I also think their durability is overrated because any manufacturer can make a durable ski if they don’t care about weight, like the K2 poacher is a similar case.

**This post was edited on Apr 11th 2024 at 2:05:44pm

If those are too heavy you should try the blackops 118. Featherweight, Only 2492g.

 

[Celery]

1900g per ski on a 176cm mango 100 is pretty significant compared to 1700g on similar park skis, it adds up. They are literally one of the heaviest park skis on the market next to the k2 Poacher.

**This post was edited on Apr 11th 2024 at 2:56:17pm

weakling

 

[Schoess]

Too heavy imo. Sold my mango 100’s after five days. I’d rather use a lighter but less durable ski. All manufacturers use the same 2.5 edge anyway and that’s the breaking point in my experience, so having a heavier and thicker sidewall adds no value for me since the edge is the thing that breaks first.I also think their durability is overrated because any manufacturer can make a durable ski if they don’t care about weight, like the K2 poacher is a similar case.

**This post was edited on Apr 11th 2024 at 2:05:44pm

Yeah so not all 2.5mm edges are created equal. Also the quality of the glue and how they are presses, as well as sidewall material makes a huge difference in how long it takes and how hard it is for the ski to separate. Everything in engineering is a trade off. Weight vs durability, cost vs quality, etc. If you have an Atomic ski with RoseArt glue stick holding it together vs an ON3P with the same edge but it has West Systems G-Flex Epoxy holding it together, you would be high on Fentanyl trying to tell me they would hold up the same just because the edge is the same width.

 

[erased]

Here’s another review they’re fucking dope

all i needed ta hear

 

[erased]

honestly i prefer more weight than super light, used to ride poachers and I honestly loved em and still love em. just wanted to switch it up, but i get it, it took a minute for me to get used to those heavy ass poachers. 2.1kilos ?

Too heavy imo. Sold my mango 100’s after five days. I’d rather use a lighter but less durable ski. All manufacturers use the same 2.5 edge anyway and that’s the breaking point in my experience, so having a heavier and thicker sidewall adds no value for me since the edge is the thing that breaks first.I also think their durability is overrated because any manufacturer can make a durable ski if they don’t care about weight, like the K2 poacher is a similar case.

**This post was edited on Apr 11th 2024 at 2:05:44pm

 

[ReturnToMonkey]

Went from skiing park on my 178 Jeff 100s and Jeff 110s to my 171 mango 100s and lemme tell you that I felt like there was nothing attached to my boots, weight wise. Also length wise, lol that 5 cm is really noticable to me.

**This post was edited on Apr 11th 2024 at 9:03:14pm

 

[jca]

All manufacturers use the same 2.5 edge anyway

**This post was edited on Apr 11th 2024 at 2:05:44pm

Who else uses 2.5x2.5? I know there's a couple of brands that do but pretty sure that's not the norm at all.

 

[SchizoSkier]

Here's your review. They absolutely rip, they are durable, tons of rocker but not "soft". The skis hook up really well when you lean them over and don't chatter on big jumps. Lighter than the 100 obviously, so perfect if you're a big techy boii on the railz. If you live in the mountains or are not Andreas Hatveit I would highly recommend the 100 because of the fun factor and it dealing with chop a bit better, however you can't go wrong either way. IMHO most major manufacturer's skis are built to the same(ish) quality (poop water). I've been riding ON3P's exclusively since 2017ish? And I don't see why I would stop anytime soon

My mangoes were not durable at all lol. One ski at least, the other is perfectly fine

 

[D*A]

Some are Surface, armada, faction

Who else uses 2.5x2.5? I know there's a couple of brands that do but pretty sure that's not the norm at all.