Nikon 35mm f/1.8 DX!

on a DX?

cause a 35mm on a DX is the same as a 50mm on an full frame...which eliminates the point of the length ( to get the same perspective as the human eye )
 
ya and id rather have the 6mm

fisheye_6mm.jpg
 
I'd like to pick one up in the near future as well..I've heard nothing but good things about it. Check out Ken Rockwells review on it if you haven't already.

"This is a wonderful lens, and for only $200, every DX shooter deserves one of these.

This could be the only lens you ever need for a DX camera."

http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/35mm-f18.htm
 
Rockwell also says to sell all of your lenses and replace them with an 18-200. His site is decent for information but don't trust his opinions.
 
Friends Dad has that lens no joke. He is a new paper photographer for the last like 30 years so he has a crazy set of glass.
 
Wow! there's a camera attached to that lens!

And whoever said 15mm, that would just be wide too, you need a 10.5 and a dx. NOOOBBB

Just kidding, That was supposed to be kinda sarcastic, just to continue the lens length corrections.
 
yeah its a pretty sweet lense. and now that i've switched cameras im gonna buy a new one.. thinking I'll try and buy a Sigma f1.4 though.. that thing is orgasmic
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top