New Kid On The Block : Fauna Skis AMA

FaunaSkis

FaunaSkis

Member
Sales of our 178 and 170cm Alparkas are now live on our site faunaskis.com. Check our the details, our future skis and if you're not in need of a new pair of park skis just yet, if you could support us by spreading the word and buying a t shirt we would really appreciate the support!

There's also a Roofbox review in the works so look out for that coming soon.

You might have seen our article about us and producing skis on the news page:https://www.newschoolers.com/news/read/New-Kid-Block-Fauna-Skis

We started building skis in 2014 with the help of members in the ski building thread and now we're at the stage of having skis in production with a factory in the Czech Republic.

Want to know more about building skis, how we found a factory to build my skis or anything? Ask here and we'll answer.

**This thread was edited on Mar 8th 2019 at 3:15:29pm
 
13994574:FaunaSkis said:
Our first ski, the Alparka is going to be ~$730CAD depending on the exchange rate. You can see all the details of our current plan for the future line here:https://issuu.com/faunaskis/docs/fauna_20skis_202018-19

We plan to ship internationally too.

**This post was edited on Feb 2nd 2019 at 3:25:03pm
Click to expand...

Seem pricey for a ski made in the Czech republic. Also, i dont think ive seen anyone outside of garage ski builders use wood sidewalls and I assume there is a reason for that.
 
13994602:TOAST. said:
Seem pricey for a ski made in the Czech republic. Also, i dont think ive seen anyone outside of garage ski builders use wood sidewalls and I assume there is a reason for that.
Click to expand...

The euro price is well within the normal range for equal quality skis and the location of a factory is increasingly having less affect on the quality. You get cheap, low quality skis from China, you get more expensive higher, quality skis from China. Same can be said for the Czech Republic. These ain’t no overpriced Walmart skis.

There are certainly other brands using wooden sidewalls. Generally smaller brands where the aesthetic, sustainability & performance is prioritised over a lower cost plastic sidewall and the extra work to finish a wooden sidewall ski. The most notable use is by Line using them on the Pescado.
 
13994602:TOAST. said:
Seem pricey for a ski made in the Czech republic. Also, i dont think ive seen anyone outside of garage ski builders use wood sidewalls and I assume there is a reason for that.
Click to expand...

$550 (usd) isn’t too bad, I’ve got faith in this company.
 
13994610:FaunaSkis said:
The euro price is well within the normal range for equal quality skis and the location of a factory is increasingly having less affect on the quality. You get cheap, low quality skis from China, you get more expensive higher, quality skis from China. Same can be said for the Czech Republic. These ain’t no overpriced Walmart skis.

There are certainly other brands using wooden sidewalls. Generally smaller brands where the aesthetic, sustainability & performance is prioritised over a lower cost plastic sidewall and the extra work to finish a wooden sidewall ski. The most notable use is by Line using them on the Pescado.
Click to expand...

Are wooden sidewalls more durable than uhmw, since this is a park ski i can see that being of extreme importance. I guess it probably binds great with the epoxy.

And yea i should have done the price conversion, its not that bad.
 
Out of curiosity, since you're a new company and don't have your own sales data, did you do a ton of market research before choosing ski dimensions? I ask this because your longest park ski is 178. That's short for anyone over 6' so you're already missing a not insignificant portion of skiers. Your longest ski is a 184, which is at the short end of what I'd consider buying for even a park ski, let alone an all mountain or pow ski.
 
13994636:TOAST. said:
Are wooden sidewalls more durable than uhmw, since this is a park ski i can see that being of extreme importance. I guess it probably binds great with the epoxy.

And yea i should have done the price conversion, its not that bad.
Click to expand...

The way woods and plastics are measured for hardness and durability are totally different and it’s hard to get comparable numbers. They are similar in terms of material density though. From our testing with using vac pressed skis, the bond and tightness of the laminate above and below are more important than the material. With moving to pneumatic pressing in the factory we will have a more consistent spread of epoxy and tighter laminate than we’ve had with our vac pressed skis which have held up well to rail abuse on our park skis so we have high expectations.

13994703:suup said:
do any other manufactures use hardwood for sidewalls?
Click to expand...

There are a few brands out there using hardwood sidewalls. From our research it’s more a Scandinavian brand thing, but the Line Pescado uses a bamboo sidewall too so we’re not alone.
 
13994686:VinnieF said:
Out of curiosity, since you're a new company and don't have your own sales data, did you do a ton of market research before choosing ski dimensions? I ask this because your longest park ski is 178. That's short for anyone over 6' so you're already missing a not insignificant portion of skiers. Your longest ski is a 184, which is at the short end of what I'd consider buying for even a park ski, let alone an all mountain or pow ski.
Click to expand...

The skis are the true tape pull length so add a few cm on and you’ll get the size others would call the skis, so they’re not super short.

When coming up with the line we did a lot of research about the sizes of skis others made and a lot of thinking about what we were going to do. We’ve started with these sizes as they were in the upper-middle of the range of sizes to suit the most skiers to start. We’ve got the shorter lengths in there to suit younger and women skiers which we intend to bring out in the Alparka and Pioneer as soon as we can.

There will be no watered down, flowery, women’s line with effeminate names. We’re a unisex brand.

As as for longer sizes, the dimensions on the skis are all proportionate to length (keeping the ski feel consistent across the lengths) so we could scale them up if there’s the demand.

Thankfully with the factory we’re working with there molds are made of tip and tail blocks and the camber comes from fully adjustable sections in the press, so making different length skis is not so expensive.

For short lengths we push the blocks together, use a little less of the block (to keep the tip heights propoertional) and have a shorter camber section. The opposite could easily be done for long.

**This post was edited on Mar 9th 2019 at 10:01:48am
 
How do you handle resizing? Do you prioritize keeping the sidecut the same on all lengths (like atomic punx or 4frnt devys) or do you keep the tip, tail, waist width the same on all sizes and just allow the sidecut to change to whatever it will as the length changes (like most manufacturers)? Or are you somewhere in between?

It bugs me so no end when marketing campaigns will be like "thanks to our 20m sidecut you'll find this ski turns like a dream yada, yada, yada" and then you look at the size you'll be buying and it has a 16m sidecut, or a 24m sidecut, and you wonder if they even tested your size at all or if they just tested the prototype in one standard size and then haphazardly re-scaled and hoped for the best.
 
13994784:Cyanicenine said:
How do you handle resizing? Do you prioritize keeping the sidecut the same on all lengths (like atomic punx or 4frnt devys) or do you keep the tip, tail, waist width the same on all sizes and just allow the sidecut to change to whatever it will as the length changes (like most manufacturers)? Or are you somewhere in between?

It bugs me so no end when marketing campaigns will be like "thanks to our 20m sidecut you'll find this ski turns like a dream yada, yada, yada" and then you look at the size you'll be buying and it has a 16m sidecut, or a 24m sidecut, and you wonder if they even tested your size at all or if they just tested the prototype in one standard size and then haphazardly re-scaled and hoped for the best.
Click to expand...

We handle resizing proportionally. We have testd

our skis in all 3 of our planned lengths for both the Alparka and Pioneer. We wanted to keep a consistent ski feel across the size range and so as the skis get shorter the other dims change with and they’re not an afterthought.

Each ski is individually designed. We have made minor compromises to reduce tooling costs but from our testing the 178 skis as welll as our future 165cm Alparka.
 
The Alparka's look absolutely stunning. Gotta ask though, what's your warranty policy on them?

Most major brands won't cover park use even on their dedicated park skis, is that the case with the Alparka's?
 
13994864:TheMailMan said:
The Alparka's look absolutely stunning. Gotta ask though, what's your warranty policy on them?

Most major brands won't cover park use even on their dedicated park skis, is that the case with the Alparka's?
Click to expand...

The only companies that covered rail damage are out of business.
 
What is being done in your company to be carbon neutral? Are you using any non petroleum based plastics? If not, do you feel like your company is playing a role in emboldening climate change?
 
13994864:TheMailMan said:
The Alparka's look absolutely stunning. Gotta ask though, what's your warranty policy on them?

Most major brands won't cover park use even on their dedicated park skis, is that the case with the Alparka's?
Click to expand...

Thanks. We are still finalising our warranty but it will likely be the fairly standard warranty from ski companies. Offering a 2 year factory defect warranty for original purchaser but if you message with a problem we’ll try our best to help sort you out. Even if it’s just talking you through a repair/ telling you what to ask for from a shop repairing them.

13994940:K-Dot. said:
What is being done in your company to be carbon neutral? Are you using any non petroleum based plastics? If not, do you feel like your company is playing a role in emboldening climate change?
Click to expand...

Given we don’t have plastic top sheets or sidewalls our plastic consumption is lower than most companies. The only plastic in the ski is the ABS tip spacers, which are ~8mm wide and 3mm thick surrounding only ~150mm from the ends of the skis, and the bases. Currently we’re unaware of any base plastics from non petro sources and we are looking at a bio composite ABS for the tip spacer.

We are also keeping an eye on the development of recyclable epoxies and would like to end up having them in the skis.

Offsetting obviously isn’t as good as removing/reducing non environmentally friendly materials but it is something we’re looking at too. Could end up with something like a trees for skis scheme where we plant trees for every pair sold.
 
13994716:FaunaSkis said:
The skis are the true tape pull length so add a few cm on and you’ll get the size others would call the skis, so they’re not super short.

When coming up with the line we did a lot of research about the sizes of skis others made and a lot of thinking about what we were going to do. We’ve started with these sizes as they were in the upper-middle of the range of sizes to suit the most skiers to start. We’ve got the shorter lengths in there to suit younger and women skiers which we intend to bring out in the Alparka and Pioneer as soon as we can.

There will be no limp-wristed flowery women’s line with effeminate names. We’re a unisex brand.

As as for longer sizes, the dimensions on the skis are all proportionate to length (keeping the ski feel consistent across the lengths) so we could scale them up if there’s the demand.

Thankfully with the factory we’re working with there molds are made of tip and tail blocks and the camber comes from fully adjustable sections in the press, so making different length skis is not so expensive.

For short lengths we push the blocks together, use a little less of the block (to keep the tip heights propoertional) and have a shorter camber section. The opposite could easily be done for long.
Click to expand...

a 178 is fine for most skiers for sure, but it seems like you're really targeting the NS demographic, which is a little different from most skiers. I understand that a lot of other companies skis measure short, but a true 178 is still too short for me. tbh I would go for a 188 in a heartbeat. There simply aren't enough long park skis out there and it would be sick if smaller companies started making them
 
13994940:K-Dot. said:
What is being done in your company to be carbon neutral? Are you using any non petroleum based plastics? If not, do you feel like your company is playing a role in emboldening climate change?
Click to expand...

Go try to start a ski company and making it green from the get go.
 
13995043:FaunaSkis said:
Thanks. We are still finalising our warranty but it will likely be the fairly standard warranty from ski companies. Offering a 2 year factory defect warranty for original purchaser but if you message with a problem we’ll try our best to help sort you out. Even if it’s just talking you through a repair/ telling you what to ask for from a shop repairing them.

Given we don’t have plastic top sheets or sidewalls our plastic consumption is lower than most companies. The only plastic in the ski is the ABS tip spacers, which are ~8mm wide and 3mm thick surrounding only ~150mm from the ends of the skis, and the bases. Currently we’re unaware of any base plastics from non petro sources and we are looking at a bio composite ABS for the tip spacer.

We are also keeping an eye on the development of recyclable epoxies and would like to end up having them in the skis.

Offsetting obviously isn’t as good as removing/reducing non environmentally friendly materials but it is something we’re looking at too. Could end up with something like a trees for skis scheme where we plant trees for every pair sold.
Click to expand...

Thank you for the response. Not sure why I got down voted for asking legitimate questions but this is ns so who knows
 
13995071:pinkcamo1000 said:
a 178 is fine for most skiers for sure, but it seems like you're really targeting the NS demographic, which is a little different from most skiers. I understand that a lot of other companies skis measure short, but a true 178 is still too short for me. tbh I would go for a 188 in a heartbeat. There simply aren't enough long park skis out there and it would be sick if smaller companies started making them
Click to expand...

I bet a large majority of people on this site ski a ski that is 178 or under.
 
13995601:SammyDubz said:
I bet a large majority of people on this site ski a ski that is 178 or under.
Click to expand...

really? maybe you're right, it would be cool to do a survey. All I know is that I heard a lot of people say they wouldn't buy HGs cause they only came in 178
 
13995601:SammyDubz said:
I bet a large majority of people on this site ski a ski that is 178 or under.
Click to expand...

I'd say large majority is pushing it. I'd say 178 is roughly the median ski size.
 
13995601:SammyDubz said:
I bet a large majority of people on this site ski a ski that is 178 or under.
Click to expand...

We have the data now (obviously not perfect).

46% of people who responded use a park ski longer than 178 and 41% use a park ski shorter than 178. So Fauna maybe should consider making longer skis. Most companies should actually.

924302.jpeg
 
13997260:VinnieF said:
We have the data now (obviously not perfect).

46% of people who responded use a park ski longer than 178 and 41% use a park ski shorter than 178. So Fauna maybe should consider making longer skis. Most companies should actually.

View attachment 924302
Click to expand...

I saw your thread about the survey and so understand the problem with survey monkey which means your sample size is limited. I still stand by the 2 sizes of our first production of our park ski, our production run sits well within the range of the answers you got and we always expected for the 178 to be the most popular length with newschoolers.

Our intention is to create a range suitable for both men & women, and so we have always had plans to do more sizes including longer & shorter sizes. Our catalog was just our first fleshed out & tested design ideas, we'll be producing a new one soon enough as we refine our designs further. As we don't have investors, other than us & our available credit/business loans, we were limited how big a range we could start with and this was what we decided was best (with the help of shop buyers and other producers).

Our all mountain freeride skis also sit nicely in the bell curve of the data from your thread.

As for the powder/freeride line our future Ibex ski sizes table has an error and should read 191, 182, 173 & 166cm so we are aware of people riding bigger skis for freeride and again our sizes fit the bell curve of the data nicely.

Don't worry, we thought this through, tested and researched the range of lengths/dims of a lot of other ski companies before coming up with designs. I'm not ashamed to admit it I'm a ski nerd.
 
13995613:pinkcamo1000 said:
really? maybe you're right, it would be cool to do a survey. All I know is that I heard a lot of people say they wouldn't buy HGs cause they only came in 178
Click to expand...

I had a pair of Stingers, my 177 Volkl walls feel wayyyyyy shorter than the HG's did. The price was definitely the demise of HG, ad if they had a longer size they probably would have lasted a little longer. Anything under 180 is too short for most of us, go into any ski shop this time of the year and try buying a park ski 180+. Nearly impossible to find.
 
14009725:-SnowSnoli- said:
Where are you guys based? I see you’re skis are made in Czech but where’s hq?
Click to expand...

Were based in Scotland but our skis have been developed over multiple winters with testing in resorts across the European Alps; British Columbia; New Zealand and Australia.
 
14009732:FaunaSkis said:
Were based in Scotland but our skis have been developed over multiple winters with testing in resorts across the European Alps; British Columbia; New Zealand and Australia.
Click to expand...

woah didn’t now you guys were up in scotland. Nothing beats scottish skiing when it’s good ;)
 
14009776:powpatrol said:
woah didn’t now you guys were up in scotland. Nothing beats scottish skiing when it’s good ;)
Click to expand...

it's certainly something special when it's good and makes some of the hardiest billy goat style skiers we've seen.
 
5 point park ski?! Is this a first or no? RMU has an entire 5 point line except the park ski. Anyway, j skis started with their park ski only going up to 178. Got the NS x J skis that Toast designed. 178s are too small for me as well but I am pumped on these designs and would love to see the wood sidewalls put through the ringer and see how they fair compared to conventional sidewalls. Anyway, props for making your dreams a reality and committing to be a start up ski company. It’s not easy to be a start up nowadays. I’m still waiting to get my revisions in the mail . . .
 
I've interviewed 3 testers so far who stated they would rather use skis manufactured by children sweatshop workers than your crappy product. I'd say you're off to a great start but you may want to ring up Revision for some advice.
 
14009732:FaunaSkis said:
Were based in Scotland but our skis have been developed by multiple child molesters including Michael Jackson, R Kelly and the late great Jimmy Savile.
Click to expand...

WTF
 
14009820:partyandBS said:
5 point park ski?! Is this a first or no? RMU has an entire 5 point line except the park ski. Anyway, j skis started with their park ski only going up to 178. Got the NS x J skis that Toast designed. 178s are too small for me as well but I am pumped on these designs and would love to see the wood sidewalls put through the ringer and see how they fair compared to conventional sidewalls. Anyway, props for making your dreams a reality and committing to be a start up ski company. It’s not easy to be a start up nowadays. I’m still waiting to get my revisions in the mail . . .
Click to expand...

Not sure, others have taper in the tips, it helps nicely in spring slush. Others maybe don’t tell you the extra 2 taper points.

We currently have a pair with Peter to do a Roofbox review so you’ll see soon enough how well our sidewalls stand up to abuse. Thanks for the props, it’s been a while coming. Shame to hear about your experience with revisions. One of the reasons we swerved pre-orders, ours are ready to go in the post when you hit buy now.
 
14009867:ACID_ said:
Leave this site

No one likes you or thinks you're funny
Click to expand...

Awww why don't you go ahead and create another thread about me? You little bitch.

I prefer not to see these POS ski "companies" flooding the forums trying to get free advertising under the guise of appealing to reddit shit fuckers like you. "OMG WE'RE A SKI COMPANY AMA YUNG BLOODZ!" Fuck off with this shit.
 
Also you gotta love the gay bashing going on with this company.

"There will be no limp-wristed flowery women’s line with effeminate names."

Yeah, limp-wristed.... I wonder were you got that term from....
 
Also you gotta love the gay bashing going on with this company.

"There will be no limp-wristed flowery women’s line with effeminate names."

Yeah, limp-wristed.... I wonder were you got that term from....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top