Need Fast Help!!! CHRONIC vs ANTIGEN

.Hugo.

.Hugo.

Active member
I've skid on LTES and Phil Larose pros the past 4 years and just broke my skis this past weekend. I know they are both light and both have tip and tail rocker. Mostly wondering how they compare in flex as i've never held a pair of 2013 Chronics before. If you can compare their flex to the LTEs that would be even better and much appreciated!

Oh and also I know LINE skis used to run long for their size. Is this still true?
 
I'd say it's really a tossup between what you personally want. Don't know much about the Anitgen, but the Recoil and Chronics are both decent all-mountain skis, but slay the park, and can hold up on small-medium jumps, and both are very, very durable. The Chronics have early rise, the Recoils have jib-rocker. The Recoil is 90mm underfoot, the Chronic 93mm underfoot. Both have essentially the same dimensions, 121/90-93/115-117. I personally would say the Recoil, the rocker is nice, even with the Chronic having early rise. I also think the Chronic will be a bit stiffer. Just my opinion.
 
Well the recoils have all terrain rocker not jib rocker but ya it's basically a toss up.

Mostly wanna know if the chronics are really stiff and if someone can compare their stiffness to another ski.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top