grilled_steeze
Member
Which one is lighter and more durable? I'm also worried about brakes on the pivots/FKS because I hear they break easily and are fairly expensive. Mounting on Nordica Enforcer 93's for agressive all mountain use.
topic:grilled_cheese said:Which one is lighter and more durable? I'm also worried about brakes on the pivots/FKS because I hear they break easily and are fairly expensive. Mounting on Nordica Enforcer 93's for agressive all mountain use.
13731160:1210020121 said:If you want light bindings, get attack 13s
If you want bindings that will last you forever, get FKS 140s
13731163:jca said:FKS 140 toes wont last forever. The heel is great but the toe is pretty meh.
13731165:ABskier said:the rockerflex 15.
13731165:ABskier said:The old 14 toe was fairly bombproof. More durable than most plastic toes. The new WTR toe is much more flimsy. Especially the AFD.
Look NEEDS to make an FKS 14/15. They still make the toe for the rockerflex 15.
13731252:1210020121 said:Stupid question, but could you buy the fks 180 toe piece and use it with the 140s?
14184027:beenjammin669_ said:what's the opinion on this thread now? asking for myself to put on some vishnu wides.
13731163:jca said:FKS 140 toes wont last forever. The heel is great but the toe is pretty meh.
14184138:anders_a said:pivot is LOW to ski, also the adjustment is so narrow, attack = long, this means the ski is stiffend up on the track part. In theory its noticable. But you have to be a very good skier or nerdy to get it.
attack green 13 is like ... 70-80USD on sale now, pivots 200-250 on sale
14184027:beenjammin669_ said:what's the opinion on this thread now? asking for myself to put on some vishnu wides.