Line invader or k2 disorderly

disorderlys are only $350 with the 10% off jibij shop thing. they're gonna last longer cause they're k2s and not invaders, be more stable cause the sidewall construction, and probably have more camber/pop. they get my vote.
 
soft, lightweight ski (invader) stiffer, burlier sidewall ski (disorderly). Both symmetrical, but completely different beasts
 
i got some disorderlys the other day, they seem very dope, a tiny bit less buttery then the invader but by no means stiff, decently light ski, i say disorderly
 
oh, good one, even though line is made by k2...idiot

they'l last a little longer because of the construction, but, im not sure so check this, what are the disorderly sidewalls like? are they more smooth/rounded on the top at the topsheet, or are they like (ex armadas) how its more of a squarelike ski and the sidewall/topsheet connection is just one point? i always like the rounded topsheet/sidewall connection cause it chips much less. the invaders are made like this.
 
Made by K2, yes, but we still have different engineers and different constructions techniques. We don't just slap different topsheets upt on our cores.
 
i'm so sick of that commet...ok yes, they're made in the same factory...but lines are totally different skis with totally different construction. i'm not saying invaders are bad skis, they're just notorious for delaminating after one season. and your right, the the k2s might end up with some ugly topsheet chips if you hit your skis together a lot, but they probably won't have any performance effecting problems like delaming or breaking.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top