K2 vs. LINE

~TheTroubleMaker~

~TheTroubleMaker~

Member
Okay... question fellas... Line Chronic verses the K2 Fugitive... both have the same side cut... almost same hight... what is the better ski? i haven't skied either...

~The one, the only, skier girl~
 
sidecut is different, fujative underfoot is 5mm or so fatter than chronic

If you suck my soul I will lick your funky emotions.

-Funkadelic
 
thats a hard one. I love the lines and they'll probably last u longer, but the k2's are also sick and cheaping, and will probably still last somewhat long

I'd buy the chronics tho, just because they are a little stiffer, its its all personal preference

For me theres skiing, nothing more, nothing less. And it consumes me, every day im out there, and every day im not
 
If you've been on the TMs you should probably go with the Chronics, they'll me more like the TMs, and if you ski all mtn. on occasion go with the Chronics because they're stiffer

Do or Do Not, there is no try.
 
i would personally take the line chronics so you have the option of skiing all mountain if you dont want to ski the park everyday. and i like line

 
they are both 80 under the foot... length is different. I can ski either one... i just think the line will hold up better... plus every kid out there and their mom is going to have the K2 because it is so cheap.. it's a dilemma really.. i don't know waht to do.. maybe i'll just get both. haha thanks guys

~The one, the only, skier girl~
 
^ did you not read the thread? There different dimensions, length, and flex, they probably have a different turning raduis too.

Sponsored By Your Mom

Drop Cliff's, Not Bombs

Make Turns, Not War

Member #259
 
just get them all!

Sponsored By Your Mom

Drop Cliff's, Not Bombs

Make Turns, Not War

Member #259
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top