K2 Shreditor 112 Test/Review

zbphoto

Active member
I'm 5'10, 140, skied the 179 mounted +2 from rec (-3 from centre), recreational background but I'm a strong skier, I prefer charging skis to play skis.

538174_10151518066676214_1224729417_n.jpg


Take this all with a grain of salt, I only skied them for around an hour and this definitely isn't my type of ski. Despite this I felt I got a good sense of how they would perform in different conditions and I think a lot of you guys are looking at these for next year. I took them on two runs down West Bowl on Whistler, nice steep cornice, funnels into some trees, and then a cat track back; great mix of terrain. We've had a pretty meh winter for pow days, so conditions today were a few cm of new snow on wind and sun baked crust.

They are very rockered in the tip and tail, have a large dose of camber underfoot, and have a definite tapered shape. They Hand flex a lot softer than they ski, but not as smooth a flex as my bibby's, more like how a JJ or TST flex. My first impressions were how loose they skied, it took me a while to get them to set an edge on groomers, definitely suffered from hooking, deflection, and tip flap (detune would help with this). I thought they'd like getting air but coming from bibby's they really lacked pop and were weirdly unbalanced, very tip heavy, almost felt like I was going to land tip first in to the snow (obviously you could adjust for this, but this was a big surprise on my first few airs). They definitely preferred bouncing around in the trees (this was definitely the skis strong point) and handled moderately well on groomers once I was able to adjust.

Honestly, I really didn't like them, felt very dead and too loose, but I also much prefer a stiff 'carve' skis for crappy whistler conditions. I think that with a centre mount + detune, and these would be a great BC booter or 3d snow tree/play ski for some of you lighter guys who really like a loose ski, but want something a little more resort friendly than the pettitor. The only ski I can really compare these too (Bibby's are a totally different beast) are my friends '12 line sfb's, which I really enjoyed (granted they were also mounted centre); they had a much more consistent flex and definitely gripped better while still remaining just as playful in similar conditions.

Anyways, I hope that was helpful.

ZB
 
interesting, when this ski became public a lot of people thought it would be their perfect mid-fat surfy ski.
 
double post sorry but i thought i'd add this in here and try and make this thread a source of various reviews for this ski. Credit to nyles who hopefully may chip in a bit more!

"And for anyone who's curious. The shreditor 112 is probably the funnest k2 ski I've ever ski'd. Actually its the only k2 ive ever liked haha Definitely lighter than most k2s and is super buttery but stable. " (nyles)
 
I'd be interested to know where the pair nyles skied were mounted? Don't get me wrong, they would be a ton of fun in blower pow, but it was super weird skiing them on hard snow, hooked like crazy yet couldn't hold an edge.
 
Don't know if these are the 102's or 112's but I approve of anything collins skis on. Definitely want to try this ski next year.

the mango chutney from SunVillains on Vimeo.
 
102's. Those are more or less the Kung Fujas with new graphics, and a possible flex pattern change.
 
K2 has a rolling stones graphic next year, its those. Not sure which ski it's on though, i thought they were recoils but those in the video looked too soft for that. You can see the 'tongue' on the tops and bases though.
 
Confirmed, they are these:

k2skis_1213_rs4.jpg


Depending on my season plans, probably be on either those or the 112s next winter.
 
I may have to pick up the 112s next season.. but I don't like all the camber underfoot. I'll wait here for more feedback though..
 
i found them quite hooky. Too much dramatic tip and tail taper. I was really hoping they would have just been a skinny version of the Petitor/120. That would be an ideal play ski
 
This was a ski I was really looking forward to. I am used to skiing one lifes in pow and they are incredible. I love a super soft ski, but the one lifes crush everything, which makes me rethink my desire for a soft ski.
 
I spent a lot of time skiing the 112's this spring and all summer, and I love em, especially in the park. I love the width and the rocker, they kick ass all over the mountain, and have that playful k2 feel. The more I broke these skis in the more I enjoyed them. They are super fun in the park, solid enough for big jumps but nice and buttery for... butters and other shenanigans. I'll probably be riding these all the time now, pretty sure they are gonna replace the Kung Fu in my quiver. FUN SKI, fo sho.

2ND half of this recent vid is all on the Shred 112

HOOD - ISH - 2013 from Collin Collins on Vimeo.

/images/flash_video_placeholder.png

 
Where have others mounted their bindings on these. I'm not a full on park skier by any means. I've got a pair of Fischer addicts that are mounted centre. Wandering if I should go for a -3cm mount or 0.

Thanks.
 
13145701:anematollahy said:
Where have others mounted their bindings on these. I'm not a full on park skier by any means. I've got a pair of Fischer addicts that are mounted centre. Wandering if I should go for a -3cm mount or 0.

Thanks.

Bump

Also wondering where to mount these for 70% all mountain, 30% park.

?
 
Back
Top