K2 reckoner 112/122 184 vs 191 lenght

extremeju

Member
Has anyone skied reckoner 112/122 in both 184/191 lenght and can compare ?

Curious to know if 191 lenght of reckoner 112 is used on FWT
 
topic:extremeju said:
Has anyone skied reckoner 112/122 in both 184/191 lenght and can compare ?

Curious to know if 191 lenght of reckoner 112 is used on FWT

I use the 184 112 and wish I got the 191. The skis are so light that despite being taller than me they feel smaller than my park skis
 
topic:extremeju said:
Has anyone skied reckoner 112/122 in both 184/191 lenght and can compare ?

Curious to know if 191 lenght of reckoner 112 is used on FWT

Really depends on your height. I’m 5’11 and although I love my reckoner 122s on the deepest days in a 191, I actually wish I got the 112 in a 184 because once the few morning pow runs get skied up into crud, you’d wish you had the 112s. If you’re anything above 6ft, get the 191s, but if you’re like my height, the 184 112s will be better. Then there’s the durability factor. Imo, if it’s firmer out you’d like the 112s much more or a stiffer ski altogether. Had a nasty fall last year trying to dodge an 8 yr old going about 50 mph and I think that’s what did it in, but the tip rocker on one of my skis is lower than the other. That increased the edge length a bit and is noticeable. Maybe a shop can heat the ski up and bend er back. Idk yet.
 
Back
Top