K2 fujative vs Dynastar Trouble marker

J

jibber[PL]

New member
What will you choose

K2 fujative with look p12 or Dynastar trouble marker with look nx 10 lifter?

Both of them are for 300$. Is it good prize?
 
fujative if you hitting anything resembling a rail..

the TM is probably a better all mountain ski - but if you are looking for a majority park ski then go the fujas..

the p12s are the better binding of the 2 in my opinion..
 
take the Fuji's, having a lifter on your binding is not good for our kind of skiing. plus i like the pivot heel of last year's bindings. TM's are an amazingly fun ski, but really don't hold up at all
 
i love my troublemakers but they do fall apart. get the k2 if you care about it lasting more than one season. also dont get a lifter binding. lifters are for carving, you want to be right on the ski for stability on rails and landings.
 
i dunno what y'all are talkin about. my tm's r holding up real nice, and ive hit tons of rails and boxes. tm's all the way niggaz
 
as said before, the p series is a much better binding. the fuji is also a better ski if you decide to hit rails and shit. its real solid. i got them, and i love them.
 
Fujitives - more durable, flexable and better binding

Troublemaker - Less Durable stiffer and worse binding

plus the fujitive is cheaper.
 
If you're going to go places other than the park, TMs are the way to go. But, don't get NX bindings, espcially with lifters. They're crappy and made for people who won't put much stress on them (i.e. not freeskiers.) If it is possible, get the TMs with different bindings.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top