IPhone X
- Thread starter Snowpeck
- Start date
I'm really into these new phones with nearly zero bezel. I'm super down with the iphone X, I will likely get it within the next 6 months. I think face ID is pretty solid, they did a really good job with it, I'll miss touch ID but whatever, seems like face ID has the potential to be faster and easier.
I also am down with getting rid of the home button, not only just for the screen, but gestures IMO are just as easy as a home button, all touch is the future for all devices, might as well start getting used to it.
Wireless charging is the future as well, they have already developed a system that will charge a phone wirelessly from 1 foot away, in the near future this will be at least 5 feet i'm thinking, so it's great to see apple embracing it.
This is probably the first time I've been excited for a new apple product in at least 6 years, so I'm looking forward to using this phone.
I also am down with getting rid of the home button, not only just for the screen, but gestures IMO are just as easy as a home button, all touch is the future for all devices, might as well start getting used to it.
Wireless charging is the future as well, they have already developed a system that will charge a phone wirelessly from 1 foot away, in the near future this will be at least 5 feet i'm thinking, so it's great to see apple embracing it.
This is probably the first time I've been excited for a new apple product in at least 6 years, so I'm looking forward to using this phone.
Frozinballz
Member
I want one once my phone takes a dump
iFlip
Active member
13839966:eheath said:
Exactly. I have the 7 now and the "home button" works exactly the same as the home button on previous iPhones. I bought the 256gb version, and am mostly happy with the 7. Somehow they made texting worse on the 7 than on the 6 I had previously, but otherwise I'm happy.
It's cool and all but it's just Apple doing what it usually does. They take technology that has been around for a while (wireless charging, virtual home button, smaller bezels, tougher componets) and present it as something new. Obviously it works because people will still buy this 1000$ iphone that will not have all of its features out of the box, and is limited compared to other phones.
Take biometrics for example. A large part of apples completion has facial recognition, iris scanning, and fingerprint scanning. Iphone has face recognition.
Stuff like that is the reason I won't buy an iPhone. I love to see innovation but Apple is the pinnacle of technological stagnation. But they get away with it nonetheless.
Take biometrics for example. A large part of apples completion has facial recognition, iris scanning, and fingerprint scanning. Iphone has face recognition.
Stuff like that is the reason I won't buy an iPhone. I love to see innovation but Apple is the pinnacle of technological stagnation. But they get away with it nonetheless.
Anyways, currently running the 6s and still pretty happy with that. Works for skiing, works for insta, photography, and whatever else I need it for
Slush
Active member
I know im probably the odd man out here, but I hate the new iPhone X. It seems to take practical things and discard them for features that are more complicated and high tech. What's wrong with a physical home button? Or an aux port? Why get rid of two useful features? I really dislike the direction apple is heading. It appears to be form over function. I'll hold on to my SE as long as I can
13840051:Lonely said:
I would be the first person to agree with you that apple just takes existing tech and rebrands it "apple" its actually genius and is basically the reason they make money, most people don't care. I'm limited due to work stuff, iOS works better with apps and such I need, I used to be an android guy forever. Anyway, its great they're embracing the tech, I think the X is the best phone they have come out with since the 5s with touch ID.
13840058:Slush said:
I mean, they're doing what tech does, change. Headphone jacks are dead, sure most phones will have them for a couple more years, but bluetooth is the future. The same thing happened when phones stopped having keyboards, people lost it that they couldn't have a physical keyboard, the home button woes will pass. Google phones haven't had a home button for like 6 years, it works just fine, its just a "new" thing to get used to. When home button lovers learn how to use the gestures and such, they will realize how much better it is. You can be like those people who keep buying flip phones in 2017, its okay.
Snowpeck
Member
13840058:Slush said:
Honestly I don’t care about a physical home button. My moto x pure has front facing speakers and a really nice screen to phone ratio so with a button on the front I wouldn’t have that. IMO, the physical home button is kinda weird to have. It’s like having a tablet but to type you use a physical keyboard. Then again, it’s just preference. I got used to having no home button really quickly and I don’t need it.
**This post was edited on Sep 28th 2017 at 10:21:24am
chrisagrams
New member
13840062:eheath said:
I agree, Ive been in both ecosystems for a long time and had a android fanboy phase and an iPhone phase. These last 6 months I had to go back to my iPhone 5 since my nexus 6p broke and I'm into the iPhones again. They just work. I've always had app compatabity issues on the nexus, Snapchat always crashing, insta never refreshing, while the iPhone just works. I'm not a fan of the 6 or the 7 cause they kinda ruined the design and the 5 by far was the best and the new X finally looks like a new good idea on the apple side.
chrisagrams
New member
13840245:milk_man said:
Well compared to the 5, the 6/7 are obviously nicer phones and I do like myself a big screen but the 6/7 compared to the other phones in the market just didn't really stand out that much. I'm not saying they're a bad phone, I've used one and I dig it, but there's nothing special about it compared to the other phones in the market and now the new X is finally a nice refresh that definitely makes it game changing.
iFlip
Active member
13840821:milk_man said:
Incorrect. You need to familiarize yourself with the differences between amortizing and costing. Furthermore, a purchase for a business often has a set lifespan or useful period. Think about computers, which will be replaced every 5 years or so for a business, depending on the business. An individual does not know how long he or she will get out of a computer. Businesses and individuals purchase products differently, with different motives, even if they are the same product. Businesses know (roughly) how and when a product will be used and when the product will no longer be useful. Individuals generally have no idea how long a product will be useful to them.
qazwsxedc34
Active member
The whole facial recognition, Iris scanning crap is too 1984 for me. I do what our future 2020 president Mark Zuckerberg does, cover the home button, cameras and speakers with black electric tape but I'm always happy to Fax Zuck over me genomes
qazwsxedc34
Active member
13840058:Slush said:
It's sort of what websites do to there interface every month. Changing shit just to change it. Like what netflix did by putting in a hundred catagories such as 90's teen late night date movies, Netflix originals with women as leads, 90's late night date night with mom, scary thrillers, thrillers with horror, just thrillers, action/adventures with Mel Gibson and on and on. I'd imagine the programmers who set this all up either are severely autistic or collect baby doll parts, seeing that a lot of new netflix kidz shows are getting more inappropreiate. With each update everything seems to be more time consuming and confusing which could be intentional, as how can we fight the elite IT pedos who run the show when we can't even find the show that we want, I understand there's a search button.
iFlip
Active member
13841188:sdrvper said:
Would you please provide me with an amortization schedule for my microwave? While you're at it, an amortization schedule for my Costco 15lb bag of pancake mix. Oh, and I grabbed a 200-pack of bendy straws while I was at Costco. I don't regularly use those, they are just in my house because once in a while friends bring their kids over, or a woman does not want to mess her lipstick up while sipping wine. An amortization schedule for those straws would be great, please.
iFlip
Active member
13841195:sdrvper said:
Still looking for those amortization schedules. Or is this a quick-and-easy way of saying that you're wrong without admitting fault?
This question is not an "I disagree with you" argument. It has a concrete, well-defined right and wrong. We're not discussing abortion rights or something intangible such as the existence of a higher power.
iFlip
Active member
13841211:sdrvper said:
Nope, wrong again. The difference between a "supply" and an "asset" is a blurry line, tied strictly to how the product is used. A company could certainly use straws to generate a profit, either directly or indirectly.
I believe where your comprehension is falling short is that amortizing has to do with tying the cost of the product to the revenue that product will directly help create. An individual does not profit off his or her purchases (whether they be microwaves, straws, or iPhones). This is why amortizing should not, and cannot, be done by an individual.
BeefiestExpert
Active member
Well I signed the iPhone forever plan so I'm kinda stuck with it regardless.
