Invader vs. ar5

[fujative92]

if the 06 invader didn't have delam problems, would you go for the invader or the ar5

 

[jah242]

id go invader tottaly centermounted and the butterzone is sick

 

[rxvcgiii]

I have AR5s... my buddy has Invaders. Quality-wise, the AR5s are superior. They're stiffer, better for all-mountain, and can hold at decent speeds. The Invaders seem lighter, WAY softer, but get really chattery. Invaders seem like a purely jib oriented ski... whereas the AR5 can hold it's own just about anywhere.

 

[Silence]

id probably say incomparable.

 

[Riley.]

Well here you go:

AR5=Good

Invader=Bad

 

[FUUUCK]

fag

 

[HoodNative]

invaders are awesome until they fall apart in 9 to 10 days. but they're sweet up to that 9th day.

 

[poofartpee]

depend for 100% park i would go invader or anthem but once i get to like 60% park i would go ar5 maybe

 

[poofartpee]

ya this guy got very good point

 

[R.I.P.BigTree]

heh i agree considering the invaders a super buttery and not very durable hence the cheap price, while the ar5s (at least the 176) a relatively stiff and much more durable while more expensive. pretty different skis all around

 

[HiTz]

for me id say ar5s...but thats because im far from a park rat...

 

[creighton]

get next years invaders

 

[off_axis]

wait for reviews... if the invaders dont fall apart get them

 

[Aclique_Clothing]

next years invaders with the fixed topsheet and the edges that wont blow up

 

[theguynextdoor91]

if there wasnt a delam problem with the invaders i would get them but i dont get out of the park very much and if i do i would probly use my other skis