Insane camera

99.999% is very inaccurate, mostly because in any estimation you should allow 5% for mistakes therefore at the least you should have said "154 million more mega pixels than 99.999% of photographers will ever need." Which would be much more believe as this camera would be marketed tot that photographers.
However, 95% is so inaccurate when you look at the large scope of wealthy photographers. Like any other hobby that requires one to collect many different types of equipment, I'm sure many photographers with the money to blow could justify purchasing this camera.
But that's just what i think.
 
just thinking out my ass here. "mega" means one million correct?
so this is actually only a 16 mega pixel 6 x 17 sensor.
even still, with that size of sensor your going to get unbelievable detail.
 
i dont want to get flamed for this but, I know megapixels dont mean shit anymore, but I use the full 21mp that I have. I have been printing 24x36 images for my thesis and at 300 dpi and at 21mp that makes a 13x19 basically. When I blow them up to 24x36 I really dont lose any quality, photoshop does a good job, but it wouldnt hurt to print a 24x36 without blowing it up
 
and my 8 look like crap, it all depends on the camera/lens/skill of the photographer
 
Because I was saying that I could use more megapixel. I have printed 20x30 form 8MP and looks great. It would be nice if I didn't need to blow it up to enlarge it :-D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top