Icelantic park skis

Kyrilmo

Member
I see people using Icelantic skis in the park, assuming it’s mostly nomads, how are they in the park? Im definitely a little worried about the durability too. Has anyone used them as a straight up park ski? Or have any recommendations for a different lightweight park ski?
 
14599536:rojo.grande said:
Wholeheartedly can back this statement having ridden all 3

I’ve only ridden the danollie and it looks so tiny on me and I’m not even that tall I’m like barely 5’8
 
14599541:switchlip2 said:
I’ve only ridden the danollie and it looks so tiny on me and I’m not even that tall I’m like barely 5’8

They sub 90 right? The new 100 looks perfect ngl
 
Icelantic has a 3 year bomb proof warranty. The rep literally tells ppl “as long as you don’t take a chainsaw to it, or light em on fire we will give you a brand new one if you break yours.

Warranty aside, they’re built tough, and ski amazingly. I highly recommend the Nomad!!!
 
14599536:rojo.grande said:
Wholeheartedly can back this statement having ridden all 3

Bro im lowkey retarded I thought this was the thread Seb made and u we’re saying how short they were not how durable they were ??
 
14599543:rojo.grande said:
They sub 90 right? The new 100 looks perfect ngl

Danollie are 95s and 180 but measure out to 177.5. I rode the gen 1 jets tho not the danollie but they are literally the exact same I’ve clicked into and hand flex danollie they are the exact same
 
14599548:KilaTsunami said:
Icelantic has a 3 year bomb proof warranty. The rep literally tells ppl “as long as you don’t take a chainsaw to it, or light em on fire we will give you a brand new one if you break yours.

Warranty aside, they’re built tough, and ski amazingly. I highly recommend the Nomad!!!

With edges too?
 
Ive been using my nomad 105’s as a all mtn ski this year but baker finally got real rails so ive been skiing them on those. Hold up nice. Real nice. They show very minimal topsheet damage and im one of those always-skiing-with-his-skis-ontop-of-one-another-guys
 
14599569:tmwtrmash said:
Ive been using my nomad 105’s as a all mtn ski this year but baker finally got real rails so ive been skiing them on those. Hold up nice. Real nice. They show very minimal topsheet damage and im one of those always-skiing-with-his-skis-ontop-of-one-another-guys

I've got 105 lites and even those feel decent the few times ive taken them through the park. Also second the topsheet durablity cuz I usually chew mine up and these still look good
 
I had the danollies back in 2016/17. Mostly rode park on them but also took them all over the mtn. The edges held up about as long as my poacher's edges. However, the edges came out clean and after that the skis kept their structural integrity much better than any other skis I've ridden. Better quality materials in the core I imagine. Overall I give them a great rating for durability. Also I wouldn't call them a lightweight park ski but they're not heavy either.
 
14599559:switchlip2 said:
Danollie are 95s and 180 but measure out to 177.5. I rode the gen 1 jets tho not the danollie but they are literally the exact same I’ve clicked into and hand flex danollie they are the exact same

Danollies you hand flexed were molested and had weights put on them and shit. My danollies are a lot stiffer than the gen 1. Still noodles though.

And yeah they are kind of short but don't look bad unless you have huge pants.
 
Another question, has anyone had them center mounted, I love the feel of a center mounted ski for park but they’re recommended for -6
 
14599714:Kyrilmo said:
Another question, has anyone had them center mounted, I love the feel of a center mounted ski for park but they’re recommended for -6

I’d go -18 back from center
 
14599714:Kyrilmo said:
Another question, has anyone had them center mounted, I love the feel of a center mounted ski for park but they’re recommended for -6

I have over 40 days of almost exclusively park on my Nomad 95s this year. I mounted them dead center. Love them. Pretty soft, super light. Can't recommend them enough. One thing I noticed the edges crack fairly easily. But as long as you register them to the warranty within 30 days of buying, they will hook you up.

**This post was edited on Mar 21st 2024 at 6:31:24pm
 
14599984:Schutzy said:
I have over 40 days of almost exclusively park on my Nomad 95s this year. I mounted them dead center. Love them. Pretty soft, super light. Can't recommend them enough. One thing I noticed the edges crack fairly easily. But as long as you register them to the warranty within 30 days of buying, they will hook you up.

**This post was edited on Mar 21st 2024 at 6:31:24pm

good to know i definitely wanted to center mount them but the recommended mount point scared me a little
 
topic:Kyrilmo said:
I see people using Icelantic skis in the park, assuming it’s mostly nomads, how are they in the park? Im definitely a little worried about the durability too. Has anyone used them as a straight up park ski? Or have any recommendations for a different lightweight park ski?

I have nomad 95s I use in the park and they are very light but stiffer and somehow less stable than I prefer, beforeI bought gilson fusions because they had a 5 year warranty instead of 3 and they quickly became my favorite ski i love their product and highly recommend it as a park ski, I coach park skiing on a toe rope so my and my athletes skis see a lot of rails, get yourself some gilsons they won newschoolers park ski of the year when I got them, promo code ‘sand’ to snag 20% off
 
14601000:Evollla said:
I have nomad 95s I use in the park and they are very light but stiffer and somehow less stable than I prefer, beforeI bought gilson fusions because they had a 5 year warranty instead of 3 and they quickly became my favorite ski i love their product and highly recommend it as a park ski, I coach park skiing on a toe rope so my and my athletes skis see a lot of rails, get yourself some gilsons they won newschoolers park ski of the year when I got them, promo code ‘sand’ to snag 20% off

bot
 
Back
Top