oneill_sean
Member
What happend to the da'nollie? Does anyone know where it went? Or why theyre not selling it anymore?
13776639:oxiclean said:I think the Nomad 95 replaced it.
13776683:Cadenmccullough said:The nomad 95 is a little different than the da'nollie. Little stiffer and not symmetrical.
13776770:oneill_sean said:Also wider
13776863:GabbleVow said:No, same width. The Da'Nollies were 95mm
13777034:oneill_sean said:I thought they were 90 underfoot
13777034:oneill_sean said:I thought they were 90 underfoot
13776683:Cadenmccullough said:The nomad 95 is a little different than the da'nollie. Little stiffer and not symmetrical.
13783054:jmellberg800 said:first the filthy riches now the da'nollie. Why do ski companies not want riders on symmetrical skis?!?!
#conspiraski
13783250:parkplayground said:asymmetrical skis are just better to ski on. I have symmetrical skis right now since I like how they feel, but asymmetrical planks ride better based on body geometry when you are switch. Why would you have want something to ski the same way forward and switch if you stand differently forward vs switch?
13783328:jmellberg800 said:thats exactly what they want you to think, im sorry but you have been indoctrinated.
#conspiraski
13783430:GabbleVow said:I don't know about that. What he says has some sense. I am more comfortable riding switch on my asym race skis than on my centered sym park skis. I can still ski switch on my park skis, but I find myself running into more problems on my park skis. Just sayin
13783464:jmellberg800 said:Thats where they get you. By the time you have reached a conclusion like that by thinking logically and rationally its already to late. You have to stay 3 steps a head by thinking irationally and close minded. Thats how you trip these companies up. Im on to you on3p and icelantic just you wait.
#conspiraski