14180736:animator said:Seems like a humble flex thread to me
14180782:Bigruss39 said:Shit my bad. It's not because I'm a good skier, just a family member has a hookup because they work in law enforcement. Was just trying to give context as to why I am asking only Oakley products so guys don't recommend how good another brands are. Sorry for the confusion, just wanted goggle input.
14180812:animator said:Oh word lmao. My reply was mostly a joke. I love my Line Miners and the new Flight Tracker and Flight Path are sick as well. I rock the HI Pink Prizm lens and almost never change it but I also like the Prizm Rose and Prizm Jade
14180874:freeskibum82 said:if you get 50% off why get a cylindrical lens like the line miner? the reason they put athletes in it is just to market it as its a mid level goggle. step up to the flight xm and never look back. I have them with 3 lenses. Sapphire prism, rose, and then hi pink for low light. super easy to swap out and the top profile of the goggles matches up to helmets nicely.
14180782:Bigruss39 said:Shit my bad. It's not because I'm a good skier, just a family member has a hookup because they work in law enforcement. Was just trying to give context as to why I am asking only Oakley products so guys don't recommend how good another brands are. Sorry for the confusion, just wanted goggle input.
14180920:animator said:The flight deck definitely has the best field of vision but the spherical aspect doesn’t make a difference to me personally
14180936:freeskibum82 said:because its spherical....spherical lens does not distort like a cylindrical does. given his discount level i'd go with spherical. The lens is also much more durable and scratch resistant. that is important to me skiing in the tight woods of the east coast.
14180965:animator said:It’s also way fucking bigger than the line miner
14180984:freeskibum82 said:flight deck XM.... no.. no it is not..