Head mojo 80s in the park, already used search bar!

dom_uk

dom_uk

Active member
hi im in the position to get these skis at cost price minus 40%, just wondering how they perform in the park, as they will be used generaly solely for that purpose, iv heard there a bit heavy?
 
stiff as hell...not very poppy....heavy as fuck...but they will last you forever......last of the tank skis out there....tougher then k2
 
stiff for a park ski but i like them that way compared to my troublemakers, lots of pop ignore the guy above, turn good and stomp landings, there not that heavy that you notice
 
id probably get them mounted near the recomended "jon olson" point, damn near centre, would this affect there "heavyness" or whatever as it would have a balanced swing weight, and how heavy xactly are they, is it noticable when grabbing in spins etc.
 
i rode them for a few runs and they were amazing in the park didnt get a chance to ride them outside the park thoe
 
They are bomb proof as hell, I've heard of em falling off car racks at 60mph and being just fine, but they are very stiff. If you are a lighter person or have weak leg muscles I wouldnt recomend them based on what I've heard about them from other people. They would be a good ski for park if you could work them around eneough with the stiff flex pattern.
 
i have the 01 mad trix in 181 and i only weigh 160 pounds, and yeaaaa, im looking for something lighter. amazing all mountain, but yeaa....
 
they're decently stiff, but you can break them in a little, they're not really heavy like people say, but heavier than some pure park skis. also durable as fuck. they have low swing weight tho if you mount at JO's recommended, so that's not an issue
 
i was hoping someone would say that they have more pop than the AR6. but it dosent matter realy, i am getting them for 200
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top