Has NS ever been sued?

Bart.Man

Active member
I read some pretty inflammatory shit in some threads on here, and it got me wondering: has Newschoolers ever been sued? I mean for anything-- libel, copyright issues, content, or anything else. How hard would it be to sue a website? When you sign up as a member, do the terms of service bar litigation? Admins, maybe you can weigh in.

DISCLAIMER- I have no intention of suing NS, I'm just wondering about NS's legal background for curiosity's sake.
 
I'm not sure you can sue someone for harassment or anything on an anonymous public website...
 
You can sue anyone for anything. You may not win, but that doesn't stop people from trying. I'd kind of like to know if anyone ever tried to sue NS.
 
I'm gonna sue you. You're fucked guy. I'm going to have a billion dollars once this is all settled and done. Merica
 
OH YEAH?let me introduce you to something i like to call freedom. Pussbag

shotgun1.jpg
 
I remember there was a whole schnizzle between TGR and Sunshine Village back when the whole patrol debacle went down and they wound up taking down a couple of threads. I'm not sure if NS avoided that one but it suggests that the industry will go after the ski forums if they feel they are being portrayed in an unfair manner.
 
I bet one of them was Lindsayjibber. She seems just nuts enough to try it. That is if she isn't too busy having skiierman's love child.
 
Hardly ever members - though this does happen. Most of the time its companies that get really mad.
 
This is where you get into 'libel'. So someone goes on a site and posts something really bad about a business - something that can be seen as harmful and not substantiated with evidence. Its tough - really though the way these things have been settled in other places is that its the person making the post that is responsible, the website is just a vehicle. However, again its pretty grey.

Most of the time if people are really lawyering up and getting ready for war, it just makes sense to delete a few posts and calm down the situation. Especially when its one person just airing dirty laundry or something like that. Of course, sometimes a company is trying to cover something up, and we won't budge. Its important that the consumer has a voice and companies take it as customer feedback. If a product has a defect or issue, we want to be the vessel of communication for that consumer.

All of this shit is a massive grey area though. Really the second someone mentions lawyers, we shut down all communication with the person, cease all action to assist them and just get the two lawyers in touch. As soon as someone brings it out the conversation outside of lawyers is pretty much over.

Lawyers are no fun to deal with, but when someone goes there you don't have a choice.

 
12941919:Mr.Bishop said:
This is where you get into 'libel'. So someone goes on a site and posts something really bad about a business - something that can be seen as harmful and not substantiated with evidence. Its tough - really though the way these things have been settled in other places is that its the person making the post that is responsible, the website is just a vehicle. However, again its pretty grey.

Most of the time if people are really lawyering up and getting ready for war, it just makes sense to delete a few posts and calm down the situation. Especially when its one person just airing dirty laundry or something like that. Of course, sometimes a company is trying to cover something up, and we won't budge. Its important that the consumer has a voice and companies take it as customer feedback. If a product has a defect or issue, we want to be the vessel of communication for that consumer.

All of this shit is a massive grey area though. Really the second someone mentions lawyers, we shut down all communication with the person, cease all action to assist them and just get the two lawyers in touch. As soon as someone brings it out the conversation outside of lawyers is pretty much over.

Lawyers are no fun to deal with, but when someone goes there you don't have a choice.

Do you guys have a lawyer in mind you would use such as DeebieSkeebies or SFB? I heard they're both law students.
 
12952004:mmccarthy14 said:
Do you guys have a lawyer in mind you would use such as DeebieSkeebies or SFB? I heard they're both law students.

ahahahaha I'd trust sfb with that kind of thing.

Pretty sure their lawyers are part of Grindmedia's legal team. I don't think it's possible to have a giant company like that without having a legal team.
 
12952131:nutz. said:
Pretty sure their lawyers are part of Grindmedia's legal team. I don't think it's possible to have a giant company like that without having a legal team.

You got it.
 
I just want it to be known that I have been speaking to my lawyer. I'm just waiting for him to get back to me because he said he needed to call his "guy" and that he's busy helping some meth dealers/cookers with some legal trouble.

BUT WHEN HE GETS BACK TO ME YOU'RE FUCKED.
 
12954104:.Rybak. said:
I just want it to be known that I have been speaking to my lawyer. I'm just waiting for him to get back to me because he said he needed to call his "guy" and that he's busy helping some meth dealers/cookers with some legal trouble.

BUT WHEN HE GETS BACK TO ME YOU'RE FUCKED.

View 1:30 for relevancy:


**This post was edited on Apr 15th 2014 at 10:59:14pm
 
12941919:Mr.Bishop said:
This is where you get into 'libel'. So someone goes on a site and posts something really bad about a business - something that can be seen as harmful and not substantiated with evidence. Its tough - really though the way these things have been settled in other places is that its the person making the post that is responsible, the website is just a vehicle. However, again its pretty grey.

Most of the time if people are really lawyering up and getting ready for war, it just makes sense to delete a few posts and calm down the situation. Especially when its one person just airing dirty laundry or something like that. Of course, sometimes a company is trying to cover something up, and we won't budge. Its important that the consumer has a voice and companies take it as customer feedback. If a product has a defect or issue, we want to be the vessel of communication for that consumer.

All of this shit is a massive grey area though. Really the second someone mentions lawyers, we shut down all communication with the person, cease all action to assist them and just get the two lawyers in touch. As soon as someone brings it out the conversation outside of lawyers is pretty much over.

Lawyers are no fun to deal with, but when someone goes there you don't have a choice.

So people have taken it to the point of lawyering up for libel on a fuckin online forum? That's beyond idiotic. How do you delineate between someone "airing dirty laundry" and someone who has a legitimate complaint against a company?
 
12953928:theabortionator said:
Just tell the judge that it was my fault and I'll get sued

See what these kids do is hear 'bout us toting pistols

And they wanna get one cause, they think the shit's cool

Not knowing we really just protecting ourselves

We entertainers, of course the shit's affecting our sales

You ignoramus but music is reflection of self

We just explain it, and then we get our checks in the mail

It's fucked up ain't it?
 
Back
Top