Straight up, here's the real deal:
1. This kid is a HIGH FUNCTIONING QUAD, which means he DOES HAVE USE OF HIS HANDS to a certain extent. He plays Wheelchair Rugby! He could get himself a very high paying job if he wanted to.
2. Even if his parents were suing, he would still have to go on the stand in court. Would that not be a good time for him to say it was his own fault??? If you want to blame his parents, blame them for raising him with poor coordination, morals and judgement. Personally, I blame the whole family.
3. I'm sure there are other means of getting money. How about support from the government? How about a campaign seeking donations from people who feel for the kid? They do that for people when their house burns down. Why not plead to the people rather than a jury? You know, seek support or even puty, but don't try to distort justice for personal gain.
4. Moe is right... The legal system is hooped! It makes it possible for people to get away with things like this. BUT, just because you can get away with it, doesn't mean you should do it. It's no less than stealing. There have been lots of times I could have walked out of a store without paying, but I didn't. Why? Because it's WRONG!!! Does that mean anything anymore?
5. For those of you who say, 'Anyone in their right mind would sue': If I ever own a ski resort, remind me to NEVER LET YOU SKI THERE!!!
6. What if the ski resort didn't have any money at all. Flat broke... Would it be okay to sue them for 5 million then??? So, why is it okay to sue big companies for stupid things just because they have a lot of money? Sure they won't go broke because of it, but does that make it right??? I don't think so!
7. If you think I'm insensitive and I should pity this kid, don't worry. I do pity him. I pity him because he made a mistake that will cost him a huge amount of freedom in his life and I really, truly can't imagine what that would be like to be in his physical condition. I also pity him because he made another mistake that will cost him a huge amount of respect for the rest of his life. No matter how much sympathy I have for this kid, there is no avoiding the fact that this was his own fault, and I will never respect him for his actions in dealing with this situation. I don't wish bad things upon him, and I'm happy that he survived. I just disagree with his decisions.
8. For those of you who think parks will not be affected by this: You are sadly uneducated. Parks already have been affected! I've seen a number of parks disappear in the last couple of years. Why? Think about it... Insurance costs are huge, and lots of resorts don't want to run the risk of having a park so they abandoned the idea. I'm not saying all parks will become extinct. That's highly unlikely, however; the cost of using parks will increase to cover raised insurance costs. Security will also increase, i.e., you will need to pay for a park pass, maybe write a test or watch a video, and you may be forced to wear a helmet etc etc...
9. One thing that has been mistaken in this thread is the amount of money awarded. It wasn't 5 million, it was just shy of 3 million, of which the plaitiff will only see a bit over 400,000 MINUS what his lawyer has cost him over the last 3 years. Not much money ends up in his hands, but the precident set by the case is what is endangering our sport.
10. The person who has been left out of this conversation is the lawyer. Shifty lawyers have created this awful stain in our judicial system! They are just as much to blame as anyone as far as I'm concerned! Our legal system is meant to protect us, but nowadays we have to protect OURSELVES FROM THE LEGAL SYSTEM!!!
BOIOIOIOIOIOING!!!
www.JIBCULTURE.com