ESPN's Response to Last Nights Judging

bp.lando

Active member
From EXPN.com

Saturday, January 27, 2007

Judgement Night

By Jeff Foss for EXPN.com

Trevor Phillips

If you caught the X Games Ski Superpipe Finals on ESPN last night, you may have woken up this morning with a funny taste in your mouth. Or perhaps your mouth tasted just fine. But either way, assuming you know enough about skiing to form an opinion about the results, you probably fall into one of two camps: Either you agree wholeheartedly with the judges' decision to award Tanner Hall the gold medal, or you wholeheartedly believe that it should have gone to Simon Dumont. Here's why both camps are right:

Tanner Hall possesses what might very well be the most technical run in halfpipe skiing: A Switch Cork 7 to alley-oop flatspin 540 to cork 900 tailgrab to right-side 540 to 540 to alley-oop to 1080. It's perfect. It's the Adriana Lima of halfpipe runs. The only thing he could possibly do to make it more perfect, in fact, would be to change things up and lead off with a switch cork 1080, thus raising the risk factor 100-fold (because if Tanner crashes this early, his entire run is shot. He is essentially putting it all on the line).

And a switch cork 1080 on top is exactly what freeskiing's warrior-poet did during his second run-perfectly.

Simon Dumont, on the other hand, possesses what might very well be the biggest run in halfpipe skiing. He gets so ridonkulously high off the deck on his first hit, in fact, that spectators gazing up from the base of the pipe quite literally lose him in the lights. He does a double-grab truck driver to mute-grab 540, a right-side 540, a cork 900 tailgrab, an alley-oop flatspin 540, a 1260 (read that again), an alley-oop 720 and a switch 720. He does every one of these tricks bigger than anybody, and needless to say, they all add up to a Superpipe run as perfect as Gisele Bundchen.

But here's the kicker: Tanner went pretty damn big in this contest, and Simon was pretty damn technical. In other words, the two best pipe riders in the known universe borrowed from each other's skill-sets. They put on one of the best shows in X Games history, and in doing so they basically rendered the contest un-callable.

This is a story as old as sports: the irresistible force of style against the immovable object of technical ability. Think Hosoi versus Hawk. Think Slater versus Irons. Hell, think Magic versus Bird. Anytime those two elements in their purest form face off on a field of play, a clear-cut victory is simply impossible. Add tonight to the chapter that explains this in the Divine Rule Book of Sport.

Hall and Dumont. The two best pipe skiers in the world, shaping and reshaping history in consecutive attempts. Our point? That on this historic evening, under the blinding lights of Buttermilk Mountain, there's only one place we wouldn't have wanted to be: In the judges' booth, holding a clipboard.

 
anytime there is a judged sport you cant complain unless you really should of won when its close and you end up getting shitted on you cant complain because you didnt make it a clear enough call that you should of won its just the nature of the sport
 
in my opinion, the hucked pencilness of tanners switch cork 10 first hit made simon the winner. plain and simple. tanner struglled to get it around he had no style on that hit, and dumonts performance was all in all better. tough call though.
 
great article, a lot of people could learn from it, just enjoy the sport, watch these guys be amazing and then be happy you didnt have to make the decision
 
it's kind of funny, when a really big spin wins, everyone is all "ahhhh fuckkkk spin to win boooooo everything should be judged on styllle"

and then, when that happens, it's all "fuccck tanner hall!'"

hmm.
 
so what determined why tanner won?

this article is smoke and mirrors.

NOthing is decided... howdid the judges choose?

ESPN is a joke... and their writers are simply cliche spewing 10 grade students.
 
exactly what i was thinking, they probly think theyve made a mistake so theyre trying to cover that shit up.
 
pretty true, i mean dumonts was smooth and huge, but t hall threw a fucking switch cork 10
 
dumonts 12 looked like shit he was all penciled out 1980's style. Didnt even try to grab just hucked... this is X-games superpipe we are talking not go huck shit
 
i support the idea behind this article. but it is simple, if you are going to throw a switch 10, you have to settle for what happens if you dont throw it perfectly/well. yes he threw a switch, but it was pencilled and he didnt hold the grab. simons first hit was more basic for him but it was huge and double grabbed, so i believe simon had the better run. petes run was nice, he was doing what no one else was, but he dragged his hand, so i dont think his third place bc of an amazing trick and a lack of other options. im not trying to take anything away from pete though, his run was nice
 
yeah dude tucking ur arms up and hugging urself while keeping both legs straight for maximum spinnage is so damn steezy
 
the judges said they wanted amplitude and technicality and dumont did both

tanner only got technicality
 
that isnt true... ya tanner penciled a little bit but he landed clean and all his other landings were perfect... did u see dumont's 1260.. that was full pencil the whole time and a switch 10 in pipe is mad harder than a regular 1260 and dumont had pretty sketchy landings all night
 
i thought the same thing too, but at least they say why they went with it. i didn't think about the risk of him not finishing the run at all being factored into the score.
 
in my opnion dumonts 1260 was kinda hucked and penciled but i still think dumont shoulda won....
 
not to be an ass or anything but......that didn't really solve or prove anything. There are are charcteristics on which the judges judge things, and i honestly think dumont schould have won. They are saying that tanner's run was more technical? No offence but i thought dumonts was just as technical, with way more style and amplitude. I know im going to get hated on by some people for that, but those are the facts. I would still give it to dumont, and i believe most skiers on this site would to. Hell i think even tanner would give it to dumont....but this shit happens every year....soo fuck it.
 
tanner did a left side five thanks NOT a ride side five

if your going to write something for the espn site that will undoughtly be read by public like us... at least he could have gotten the run right in the first place
 
dumont should have 1 for sure. Tanners switch 10 was soo ugly and hucked plus he didnt even land it clean. I dont know how he got a 95 on that run its bullshit.
 
How can anyone watch these runs and seriously say that halfpipe skiing can not be an Olympic sport beside halfpipe snowboarding... those runs were off the meat rack.
 
how can you say that tanner hucked that switch ten when dumonts 12 was hucked alot more with no style it was like watching a figure skater, tanners run had something that no one has done before switch 10 first hit. dumont didnt even grab his last switch 7
 
Where u watching. In his first run that might have been true but in his second and third he might not have grabed but it was crossed up. Tanners 10 was soo hucked. That was the ugliest thing i was in the pipe all night. He didnt even land it clean.
 
since when is and alleyoop hit, a flat 5, or a cork 9 rediculously tech tricks? those have been stock in pipe for years.
 
it was decided by ONE FUCKING POINT. GET THE FUCK OVER IT. it could have gone either way, but it went tanner's, so quit hatin and be glad that your punk ass got to watch two basically perfect pipe runs.
 
"It's the Adriana Lima of halfpipe runs" haha thats great

I think it was pretty damn close but i think t-hall deserves the gold
 
I recorded it last night and when you go back and look at it full speed you really don't notice how hucked Tanners first hit was. Also Dumonts second run was looking better than his third run was he landed the 1260 way better in that run then the last one.
 
Back
Top