DYNASTAR SLICER?

13716280:MikeWeinerONE said:
They're good park skis if you're strong and mainly hit jumps. Awesome ski though all around.
Click to expand...

Yea im 200 lbs so I feel like they would be a little more flexible for me
 
13716304:steezy_simon said:
Yea im 200 lbs so I feel like they would be a little more flexible for me
Click to expand...

Then you'll be fine, they're just bigger so you needa be able to flex them. Not a good choice for a 14yo. My homie Chanc' rides them in the park as his park ski and he does good on them.
 
13716386:MikeWeinerONE said:
Then you'll be fine, they're just bigger so you needa be able to flex them. Not a good choice for a 14yo. My homie Chanc' rides them in the park as his park ski and he does good on them.
Click to expand...

why do you say that, are they particularly stiff or something?

ive never heard of these til now but i like the sounds of them and their specs, and my old troublemakers were some of my favorite park skis ever. can anyone tell me about these and/or how they compare to other skis in their genre (98 waist, park/all mtn ski)

thanks
 
13716764:Titsandwich11 said:
why do you say that, are they particularly stiff or something?

ive never heard of these til now but i like the sounds of them and their specs, and my old troublemakers were some of my favorite park skis ever. can anyone tell me about these and/or how they compare to other skis in their genre (98 waist, park/all mtn ski)

thanks
Click to expand...

They aren't super stiff, stiffer then most skis they are Dynastars, but most park skis are much narrower. 98 under foot is a harder ski to spin on. If you're say 14 and weigh 90 lbs, it will be much more difficult then if you're 25 and weigh 170 lbs and have much more strength. There's a reason most top level pros ride 84 or less underfoot unless you're Andy Mahre :) ... They work well in park tho. Pm me if you want more info.
 
13716819:MikeWeinerONE said:
They aren't super stiff, stiffer then most skis they are Dynastars, but most park skis are much narrower. 98 under foot is a harder ski to spin on. If you're say 14 and weigh 90 lbs, it will be much more difficult then if you're 25 and weigh 170 lbs and have much more strength. There's a reason most top level pros ride 84 or less underfoot unless you're Andy Mahre :) ... They work well in park tho. Pm me if you want more info.
Click to expand...

hmm yeah sounds pretty good to me. i know dynastar has sorta left the limelight since the days of having one of the most popular teams in park skiing (troublemaker days) so i guess im not shocked i havent seen much about these, but man, a ski with these specs that's pretty stiff...sounds pretty dope. like i said, the TMs were super sick (i was one of the lucky people whose edges didnt rip out quickly)

thanks man, ill need to check em out next time im looking to replace my high 90s waist park/resort skis
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top