Dynafit Dhaulagiris

God

Member
1cc02db9-b0c5-4be2-97d1-530259a31f67_5-crop-rotate.jpg


Has anyone demo'd or ridden these skis? I'm thinking about buying a pair for an everyday touring setup (mounting with radical 2.0's) but there's not a lot of information about them on the web. Wildsnow gave them a good review but I'd like to hear some first hand experiences from real people.

Any info is much appreciated as well as recommendations for touring skis in the same class, I've already got a pair of Rossi s7's with a 115 waist so I'd like something between 90-100
 
I was not a fan at all. The ski was too nervous at speed. Too much chatter on slab or wind blown. It would be alright as a quiver ski for a dedicated high alpine but not the ski I would pick for an all around. Take a look at the Helio 95 from BD. Way more stable. Just my thoughts. The 2.0 is my least favorite AT binding on the market right now. Any reason you are going that route?
 
13756796:snowpocalypse said:
I was not a fan at all. The ski was too nervous at speed. Too much chatter on slab or wind blown. It would be alright as a quiver ski for a dedicated high alpine but not the ski I would pick for an all around. Take a look at the Helio 95 from BD. Way more stable. Just my thoughts. The 2.0 is my least favorite AT binding on the market right now. Any reason you are going that route?

It's got a decent weight, safety specs and good reviews. I've been skiing on speed radicals and I'm happy with their construction, why don't you like them?
 
13756796:snowpocalypse said:
I was not a fan at all. The ski was too nervous at speed. Too much chatter on slab or wind blown. It would be alright as a quiver ski for a dedicated high alpine but not the ski I would pick for an all around. Take a look at the Helio 95 from BD. Way more stable. Just my thoughts. The 2.0 is my least favorite AT binding on the market right now. Any reason you are going that route?

I also do about 95% of my skiing backcountry so I'm trying to balance performance, safety, and weight. Not a fan of the kingpins at all, and the beasts are too heavy/expensive; my other choice would be the G3 Ion LT's
 
I just can't stand the turn and play in the toe. I have been skiing the G3 Ion 12 and it is by far the most user friendly AT binding on the market. You still have the elasticity in the heel and great response. If toe release is that important take a look at the Vipec. Adds a little weight but still way better than the Rad 2.0
 
13756912:snowpocalypse said:
I just can't stand the turn and play in the toe. I have been skiing the G3 Ion 12 and it is by far the most user friendly AT binding on the market. You still have the elasticity in the heel and great response. If toe release is that important take a look at the Vipec. Adds a little weight but still way better than the Rad 2.0

What do you mean by user friendly? Is it just easy to use or a quality binding
 
For starters the 2.0 has a turnable toe which when in deep snow can be rather hard to step into. I have seen a handful of very experienced AT skiers break the heel when stepping down. It is very hard to line up the heel pins with the boot when there is movement in the toe. The G3 on the other hand has the best toe engagement in the game right now. Even in deep snow where visibility of the toe is very limited the placement and trap to the pins is effortless. The Heel in the 2.0 is not that different than in the past. What I like about the G3 is the ability to switch from hike to ski with just a smack of my pole. The 2.0 still requires a reach back. Not the end of the world for experienced ATers I will say I was and am still blown away by the ease and function of the ION.
 
13757181:snowpocalypse said:
For starters the 2.0 has a turnable toe which when in deep snow can be rather hard to step into. I have seen a handful of very experienced AT skiers break the heel when stepping down. It is very hard to line up the heel pins with the boot when there is movement in the toe. The G3 on the other hand has the best toe engagement in the game right now. Even in deep snow where visibility of the toe is very limited the placement and trap to the pins is effortless. The Heel in the 2.0 is not that different than in the past. What I like about the G3 is the ability to switch from hike to ski with just a smack of my pole. The 2.0 still requires a reach back. Not the end of the world for experienced ATers I will say I was and am still blown away by the ease and function of the ION.

Yeah..... The ION is freaking rad, and I do agree with everything you said, but I've had some pretty significant durability issues, where I have friends who go way harder than I do spending significant time on the Rad 2.0 and hucking hard with no issues.

Had a pair of last year's IONs, the heel would rotate and allow the brake to pop down while touring pretty often, this got really annoying. Eventually warrantied them, got a new pair, the spring in the risers wore out so that they flopped annoyingly and wouldn't stay in place, you had to ski strap them in place or else you'd go from flat to both risers accidentally every other step. Same thing happened to my buddies so we warrantied both pairs again.

Then, just an hour ago I hit a patch of denser pow and popped out of one heel, leading to a double eject. When I went to put them back on I found that one of the heels had slid back about 1.5cm from the brake, as far as I can tell the spring loaded track failed. That made it impossible to click in, so I ended up skiing own with one ski in tele mode, and then ski strapping my brake up to skin out.

I will agree, ION's are by far the easiest binding I've used as far as clearing ice, using the risers, and stepping in and out, but I'm much more confident in a binding like the Rad 2.0 or Kingpin (or maybe the BD Vipec) than I am of the ION, I've just had too many failures.

That said, I do have a pair of the new ION (which only supposedly saw small revisions to the risers shapes) that I have like 5 days on with no issues, but that's not enough time to convince me that I love them after all the trouble my buddies and I have had.
 
Overall I really liked this ski. If I could only have one pair for all round BC use this would be a top contender.

It addresses the main issues with the Denali - fragile and to chattery on edge. Overall it doesn't add to much weight to the Denali and cuts the consumer cost by $200.

Paired with ion LTs or speed radicals and the precut speed skins this is a really versatile touring set up
 
13758653:cobra_commander said:
Overall I really liked this ski. If I could only have one pair for all round BC use this would be a top contender.

It addresses the main issues with the Denali - fragile and to chattery on edge. Overall it doesn't add to much weight to the Denali and cuts the consumer cost by $200.

Paired with ion LTs or speed radicals and the precut speed skins this is a really versatile touring set up

What did you ski with them? I'm thinking they might not be ideal for tighter stuff like east coast trees and whatnot, they've got a big shovel to them which makes me think they might not be as responsive as I need
 
Spring Groomers and bumps.

The narrow tail lets them come around quick. They are not a poppy like nimbleness but rather a smooth slarvy ease it tighter places.
 
Back
Top