Do brands size different?

DaveJ

Member
So I recently purchased icelantic da'nollies which are 170cm but when I put them next to my k2 domains which are 169 the da'nollies are about 4 inches shorter. I haven't been able to see them yet since i'm at school but does the tip and tail rise higher on the da'nollie. Can I trade them in for 180cm even after mounting?
 
topic:Daveycrocit1010 said:
So I recently purchased icelantic da'nollies which are 170cm but when I put them next to my k2 domains which are 169 the da'nollies are about 4 inches shorter. I haven't been able to see them yet since i'm at school but does the tip and tail rise higher on the da'nollie. Can I trade them in for 180cm even after mounting?

i have some salomon dumonts from a couple years ago that are 170 and also have k2 domains that are 174 and there is a much bigger difference than 4cm between the two
 
topic:Daveycrocit1010 said:
So I recently purchased icelantic da'nollies which are 170cm but when I put them next to my k2 domains which are 169 the da'nollies are about 4 inches shorter. I haven't been able to see them yet since i'm at school but does the tip and tail rise higher on the da'nollie. Can I trade them in for 180cm even after mounting?

I wouldn't think you would be able to trade them in once they have been mounted. Doesn't hurt to give it a try though!
 
its because some brands measure length before pressing (makes them little shorter) and some other brands measure length after pressing (makes them tru to the size)
 
13577279:Mr.noodle said:
K2 skis always run big for some reason, someone explained it to me a while ago but I don't remember

it's probably because they measure after the skis have been pressed.

Some companies just measure the length of the wood before it is pressed. Then when it is shaped, it will be a little shorter. If that makes sense?
 
13577900:Cats. said:
K2s are always long, they measure after shaping

I feel like this would be more "true to size" since they are the length they say they are haha. But I guess it doesn't work like that
 
13577902:Mingg said:
I feel like this would be more "true to size" since they are the length they say they are haha. But I guess it doesn't work like that

Either way is accurate imo, it's like comparing circumferance (or half the circumferance) to diameter. But yeah I agree, I prefer K2's method.
 
Some brands measure nose to tail, and others measure the length of the surface that contacts the snow. It just depends on the brand
 
Park and powder skis from k2 used to run big but they changed this for powder skis in 2010 and park skis last year (I thought). They measure straight from tip to tail.
 
Back
Top