Craft vs Art

panojibber.

Active member
Posted something similar to this on another forum, curious to see where M&Aers weigh in on this.

One distinction in creative work that has really begun to bug me is that of Art vs Craft.

Lets think of this from a ski film perspective:

Take for example, Idea.

It was based around an original soundtrack, not using poles, and is more or less a conceptual movie that challenged how major ski film companies did things at the time. Low budget, filming done within the crew, etc.

Now think of PBP or MSP, who have basically made the same movie every year for the past 4 or 5 years.

I would consider Idea a work of art. I would NOT consider most recent PBP or MSP movies a work of art, because they are highly derivative of previous work, and don't really offer something conceptually interesting or different each year. However, both MSP and PBP are damn good at making a single type of ski movie, and they do it every year without fail. I'd consider these movies works of craft.

Here's a quote from "Art and Fear" by David Bayles and Ted Orland:

"In essence, art lies embedded in the conceptual leap between pieces, not in the pieces themselves. And simply put, there's a greater conceptual jump from one work of art to the next than from one work of craft to the next. The net result is that art is less polished - but more innovative - than craft. The differences between five Steinway grand pianos - demonstrably works of consummate craftsmanship - are small compared to the differences between the five Beethoven Piano concerti you might perform on those instruments.

A work of craft is typically made to fit a specific template, sometimes a painstakingly difficult template requiring years of hands-on apprenticeship to master. Its staggering to realize that nearly all the truly great violins ever produced were made in the course of a few years by a few artisans living within a few blocks of each other. All this in a remote Italian village, three centuries ago. The accomplishments of Antonio Stradivari and his fellow craftsmen point up one real difference between art and craft: with craft, perfection IS possible."

Do you consider yourself an artist? Or a craftsman? Would you prefer to have 10 perfect, formulaic edits/movies that everyone likes, or a diverse body of work that challenges your viewers? Thoughts? Am I an idiot?

 
I don't know if any ski movie or edit I've ever seen has seriously "challenged" me, but I would rather see edits that are very different every time and experiment with new things than a formulaic, polished product.

I do think something experimental and challenging needs to be done with a degree of skill and "polish" for anyone to care about it or take it seriously though.

Creativity and originality in the skiing is what impresses me the most

in ski media, but I also love it when new or little used filming

techniques are used. I think in the case of skiing though it is most

important to focus on having excellent camera and editing work to best

showcase the action.
 
The thread title confused me a little, but I think I've got a grasp of what you are trying to say.

Using that analogy to relate to ski edits is difficult... What I can say in my opinion however, is that most of the "top rated" video's these days are feeling more like Steinway grand pianos, as opposed to one of five Beethoven Piano

concertos... If you catch my drift.

Does anyone agree?
 
Yeah its a little weird to apply to ski edits/ ski film making, but thats basically what I'm getting at.Its not a bad thing - it takes some really good filming and editing to produce something high quality enough to get top rated, but I think it'd be cool to see more conceptual jumps between pieces.

Take for example, Knife Show's work - obviously at this point we know what to expect from his work, and its dope either way, but the FIRST time you watched a Knife Show edit, I bet you were blown away by how unique it was compared to other video work (because I definitely was). Even if the riding isn't constant bangers for 5 minutes, its really entertaining because the way the material is presented is interesting and draws you in. Its the concept that keeps you watching, not necessarily the riding.

Not trying to criticize anyone here, thats the first thing I want people to know in this thread. Just trying to present a different perspective.
 
^knife show is a good example, and it's clever, but I think it's very

difficult and obviously takes a lot of thought to make a really

conceptually groundbreaking ski video, I'd say All I Can and Sweetgrass

Productions last movie with the Heart of Darkness Narration have a

conceptual thread that ties the movie together well. While We Can also presents some interesting material skiing/style wise.
 
Back
Top