Canada eh!!! Where you kill someone with your car and then sue them for mental distress.

Mr.Huck

Active member
http://www.torontosun.com/2014/04/25/driver-that-struck-teen-suing-dead-boys-family

Driver that struck teen suing dead boy's family

1294

By Tracy McLaughlin ,Special to QMI Agency

First posted: Friday, April 25, 2014 09:50 AM EDT | Updated: Friday, April 25, 2014 08:00 PM EDT

Brandon Majewski died after being hit by a car while riding his bike on Oct. 28, 2012. Brandon Majewski died after being hit by a car while riding his bike on Oct. 28, 2012.

Article

1297553213902_ORIGINAL.jpg


Witness haunted by tragic bike accident

ALCONA, ONT. - Still in the throes of agony from losing their son in a vehicle crash, the parents of young Brandon Majewski are now reeling after they learned the woman who struck and killed him is suing their dead child.

“I feel like someone kicked me in the stomach — I’m over the edge,” the dead boy’s father, Derek Majewski, said. “Sometimes, it makes my blood boil.”

As he sits in his immaculate Alcona home, near the shores of Lake Simcoe and roughly 90 km north of Toronto, sifting through piles of photographs of his son, the heartache shows on his face and he can hardly contain his tears as he speaks.

Just down the road, on the side of a quiet country stretch of Innisfil Beach Rd., is a memorial complete with a bicycle, flowers and photographs of his son, Brandon.

The spunky, handsome, 17-year-old bike enthusiast was out with his two buddies on Oct. 28, 2012 when they hopped on their bicycles to go for hot dogs on a drizzly, dark night around 1:30 a.m.

“I know they should not have been out there that late,” his father said. “But they are good kids.”

Brandon was struck from behind by an SUV and killed while his friend Richard McLean, 16, was seriously injured with a broken pelvis and other bones. His other pal Jake Roberts, 16, was knocked off his bike but sustained only scratches.

Now the driver of the SUV, Sharlene Simon, 42, a mother of three, formerly from Innisfil, is suing the dead boy for the emotional trauma she says she has suffered. She’s also suing the two other boys, as well as the dead boy’s parents, and even his brother, who has since died. She’s also suing the County of Simcoe for failing to maintain the road.

Even the family’s lawyer is in shock.

“In all of my years as a lawyer, I have never seen anyone ever sue a child that they killed,” Barrie lawyer Brian Cameron said. “It’s beyond the pale. I just couldn’t bring myself to tell them on the phone.”

After a face-to-face meeting Tuesday, the parents and step-parents left his office almost staggering in disbelief.

“I’m devastated, I’m in shock,” said Brandon’s mother, Venetta Mylnczyk, a dental assistant who is drowning in sorrow. “She killed my child and now she wants to profit from it? She says she’s in pain? Tell her to look inside my head and she will see pain, she will see panic, she will see nightmares.”

Her voice shaking with emotion, the mother recalls her last words with her son.

“I said I love you … he said, ‘I love you, too, mom,’ and off he went with his friends,” Mylnczyk said. “At least I have that … but for this woman to be so selfish, to claim she is the one suffering but we are the ones living the nightmare … her children are still living.”

“It blows my mind,” Brandon’s step-mom, Lisa Tessier, said. “We are all devastated. This is so cruel.”

In a statement of claim filed with the court, Simon is claiming $1.35 million in damages due to her psychological suffering, including depression, anxiety, irritability and post-traumatic stress. She blames the boys for negligence.

“They did not apply their brakes properly,” the claim states. “They were incompetent bicyclists.”

Simon’s lawyer did not respond to a request for comment from the Toronto Sun Friday.

Brandon’s father shakes his head.

“They’re kids!” he gasps. “And they have a right to make mistakes ... it was a wet, dark road — what about slowing down?”

He insists the reflectors on the bikes would have been visible.

A South Simcoe Police report shows Simon admitted that she was driving at 90 km/h in an 80 km/h zone on the two-lane road. She claims she didn’t see the boys or any of the orange-red pedal reflectors. The impact of the collision cracked the windshield of her SUV, dented the bumper, a headlight was busted, the roof where Brandon hit was dented and scratched and a side mirror dangled by its wires.

The report also states: “No breathalyzer was performed. Although police say no alcohol was suspected and no charges were laid.

Simon’s husband, Jules Simon, a York Regional Police officer, was driving behind his wife that night, but little is mentioned about him as a witness in the police report. He pulled over when Brandon was struck and shortly after drove his wife home in his vehicle.

Two hours later, after Brandon lay dead in hospital from multiple traumatic injuries, police knocked on the door of the Majewski’s home.

The dogs began to bark. It was late.

“I knew,” says his father, and his voice breaks again. “I had a gut feeling.”

Therapy, medication, even booze, doesn’t dull the pain.

And then, six months after the funeral, he awoke to find his second son Devon, 23, who had just graduated as a paralegal, laying in his bed, blue and dead, after popping too many pills and drinking too many shots. Not an intended suicide, they are certain — he was just trying to stifle his grief.

“This has ripped our family apart,” says Majewski. “And now this woman has the gall to try to profit from our dead child she killed? Profit from another boy who was almost crippled?”

He flips again through the family photographs. Happy times of fishing, dirt biking, swimming, eating birthday cake, laughing. He chuckles for a moment when he remembers all the bikes his son rebuilt — sometimes he would sneak the parts right into his bedroom, and shine them till they gleamed. All another world away.

“This thing haunts us,” he says. “It will never stop haunting us.”

Cameron has launched a routine lawsuit against the driver, mainly for medical and funeral costs on behalf of the boys and their families. He alleges Simon was speeding and may have been intoxicated and talking on her cellphone.

“Sharlene Simon failed to take reasonable care to avoid a collision which she saw or should have seen was likely to occur,” his claim states. “She operated the motor vehicle while she was intoxicated.”

None of the allegations have been tested in court.
 
There was a teenager who tried to commit suicide by driving into another car, she ended up living, but killed a mom and two kids. Girl then tried to sue the husband. Something along those lines.
 
yeah i guess the only part that really gets me about this story is that they were kids. had they been negligent adult bikers, maybe.... MAYBE you can plead the case that it was just as much their fault as it were yours. but not when it's a kid. kids shouldn't have to die because they made a mistake. we all do, and when we grow up we realize "wow that was dumb and dangerous". but that's the nature of being a child. we as adults have to look out a little extra hard for them.

but i guess it's one thing that he had to die, and another to pursue further action and hope to benefit from his death. that's pretty gutless and despicable. how can you look a family in the eye and say you're suffering immensely and need to win the sweepstakes to soothe your pain when they're the ones who have the dead child. i just don't know..

everyone has their price though, right? if you have a chance to get a free million dollars at the cost of doing something morally disgusting, most people would probably do it. fuck those guys and their loss, i want my million bucks.
 
Seems pretty legit. I mean look what those stupid kids did to her? They might have even made her drop her phone in the middle of taking a selfy for facebook. I'm surprised she sued for so little. I would think she'd be entitled to at least double that.
 
12968722:Sander. said:
Yes this is definitely representative of all Canadians.

Which country is known for ridiculous lawsuits again? Oh right, the good ol USA.

Wow, it only took until the first post until you made this an anti-USA thread. Thanks Canada guy, go fuck yourself you pretentious douche.
 
12968722:Sander. said:
Yes this is definitely representative of all Canadians.

Which country is known for ridiculous lawsuits again? Oh right, the good ol USA.

It's alright man, being jealous of the greatest country on earth is natural
 
12968768:Dustin. said:
Wow, it only took until the first post until you made this an anti-USA thread. Thanks Canada guy, go fuck yourself you pretentious douche.

While in a way Mr. Huck implicitly made this seem like this is a problem unique to Canada with the title.

There are fucked up lawsuits in every country, I don't see what we gain from pointing out this particular one happened in Canada or the overly generalized assumption by Sander.
 
wait a second, so this bitch was speeding and ran in to some bikers, but she is suing them and claiming that they "did not apply their brakes properly"? I mean, what the fucking fuck? i've seen some frivolous lawsuits over the years, but this bitch takes the fucking cake. i hope everything bad in life happens to her and no body else.

gutless, heartless fucking cunt. i hope someone kills this whore...and i don't honestly wish death upon people very often....
 
I hope this shit doesn't even make it to court. Any judge with half a mind would throw this shit out in an instant anyway. If that murderous bitch doesn't realize that, she's even more fucked in the head than it seems. Oh, and better watch what you say on here. She's probably scanning the internet looking for people she can sue for libel in addition to suing a dead boy.
 
I actually used to live just off the road this happened on. Drove it every day. It is a dark road and people go quickly on it. It is unfortunate, but not surprising that there was an accident. It has a soft shoulder so I guarantee the kids were in the lane and just assuming they would be seen. I'm not taking the responsibility off the driver, even at the last second there are things you can do to not hit a kid. Even if it means driving straight into the ditch. But I can totally understand how the accident happened. It was not a road that should have had any pedestrian traffic.

Now for the lawsuit, It's heartless yes, but lets say some of her allegations are true. I know for one if I killed a kid I would be absolutely distraught. I probably would have to take some time off work to come to terms with what I did and I guarantee I would have some mental issues because of it. I myself probably wouldn't look for compensation from it, but she did and that's her choice to make. Somebodies negligence caused her harm and that is one of the reasons the lawsuit system is in place.

It's a very sad situation and I don't agree with what she did or is doing. But the kid should not have been on that road (where were the parents. My parents would have lost their shit if they found out I was biking on an unlit country road at 1 am). I don't think we should completely demonize the woman and put the kid on a pedestal. He was old enough to know it was dangerous.

On a side note: if someone jumps off a bridge to commit suicide, and hits your car. Are you just SOL and have to pay out of pocket?
 
12968722:Sander. said:
Yes this is definitely representative of all Canadians.

Which country is known for ridiculous lawsuits again? Oh right, the good ol USA.

12968768:Dustin. said:
Wow, it only took until the first post until you made this an anti-USA thread. Thanks Canada guy, go fuck yourself you pretentious douche.

12968818:_DUSTY_ said:
While in a way Mr. Huck implicitly made this seem like this is a problem unique to Canada with the title.

There are fucked up lawsuits in every country, I don't see what we gain from pointing out this particular one happened in Canada or the overly generalized assumption by Sander.

Thread title was sarcasm. I definitely realize that stupid lawsuits happen everywhere now. As to this case, it may have been the kid's fault, the article doesn't really give enough details and the real story probably won't come out because it seems like the only witness is the husband.

Point was - who the fuck sues the family of the kid they just ran down? That takes someone who has no soul.

Anyway, wasn't seriously dissing Canada. It's too bad that any country has to deal with this shit. Civilizations decline at a rate which is directly proportional to the number of practicing attorneys. Save the planet; eat a lawyer.
 
12968726:TOAST. said:
There was a teenager who tried to commit suicide by driving into another car, she ended up living, but killed a mom and two kids. Girl then tried to sue the husband. Something along those lines.

Ppl like this should be executed on live television
 
12968934:timmi said:
I actually used to live just off the road this happened on. Drove it every day. It is a dark road and people go quickly on it. It is unfortunate, but not surprising that there was an accident. It has a soft shoulder so I guarantee the kids were in the lane and just assuming they would be seen. I'm not taking the responsibility off the driver, even at the last second there are things you can do to not hit a kid. Even if it means driving straight into the ditch. But I can totally understand how the accident happened. It was not a road that should have had any pedestrian traffic.

Now for the lawsuit, It's heartless yes, but lets say some of her allegations are true. I know for one if I killed a kid I would be absolutely distraught. I probably would have to take some time off work to come to terms with what I did and I guarantee I would have some mental issues because of it. I myself probably wouldn't look for compensation from it, but she did and that's her choice to make. Somebodies negligence caused her harm and that is one of the reasons the lawsuit system is in place.

It's a very sad situation and I don't agree with what she did or is doing. But the kid should not have been on that road (where were the parents. My parents would have lost their shit if they found out I was biking on an unlit country road at 1 am). I don't think we should completely demonize the woman and put the kid on a pedestal. He was old enough to know it was dangerous.

On a side note: if someone jumps off a bridge to commit suicide, and hits your car. Are you just SOL and have to pay out of pocket?

That might be fine if she wasn't asking for much. Asking for over a million? For what? Even if it was 100% the bikers fault it wasn't like they shot at her and now she's got issues. She doesn't have any medical expenses, so asking for that kind of money deserves a bitch slap.

If you're going down the route of trying to justify what she's doing you should have rolled with the fact that she's doing it as a countersuit. Then mention that she feels she did nothing wrong and it was a terrible accident with suffering on both sides and that she would probably drop the lawsuit if the family drops theirs.

Instead you didn't and failed terribly on that argument. Better luck next time.
 
Such a fucked scenario. How could anyone have that kind of nerve. Clearly at fault, unable to admit guilt, and greedy? Fuck the world.
 
12968970:Mr.Huck said:
Thread title was sarcasm. I definitely realize that stupid lawsuits happen everywhere now. As to this case, it may have been the kid's fault, the article doesn't really give enough details and the real story probably won't come out because it seems like the only witness is the husband.

Point was - who the fuck sues the family of the kid they just ran down? That takes someone who has no soul.

Anyway, wasn't seriously dissing Canada. It's too bad that any country has to deal with this shit. Civilizations decline at a rate which is directly proportional to the number of practicing attorneys. Save the planet; eat a lawyer.

I definitely didn't assume you were meaning to diss Canada, you never really seemed like the type of member to do that. Unfortunately sometimes (or many times) sarcasm isn't understood over the internet, I was more talking to the people who were replying and just used your thread title as an example.
 
You can attempt to sue for anything. I don't know the steps of the legal process but the end of the article mentions that none of this has been tested in court. Sooooooo what are her real chances? I really hope slim.

No need to sue, they are suffering worse than you are. What's the legal age in Canada for adults? How are the parents responsible? This is beyond fucked. It's the fuckest.
 
This made me puke in my mouth a little. Its the kind of thing I wouldn't be surprised to hear about in the US but not up here. Cringe and a half that "people" like this exist
 
This made me puke in my mouth a little. Its the kind of thing I wouldn't be surprised to hear about in the US but not up here. Cringe and a half that "people" like this exist
 
12969216:-benedetto said:
She did admit to going 10km over the limit. Wtf mate

Barely over the speed limit and not a very fast speed. Could it have been to fast for conditions? Sure but it's not like she was going insanely fast.
 
12969364:theabortionator said:
Barely over the speed limit and not a very fast speed. Could it have been to fast for conditions? Sure but it's not like she was going insanely fast.

I agree, just making points for the family. This lady wasn't doing everything she could to drive safe in a drizzle if she was going a little fast.
 
majority of you seemed to miss the key word here: "allegations".

you can sue for whatever the fuck you want.

that doesn't mean it will see a minute in a courtroom.
 
12969615:seward said:
majority of you seemed to miss the key word here: "allegations".

you can sue for whatever the fuck you want.

that doesn't mean it will see a minute in a courtroom.

I don't think that really matters in this case. Honestly either way it's the thought that counts on this one.
 
12969644:theabortionator said:
I don't think that really matters in this case. Honestly either way it's the thought that counts on this one.

100% agree. Whether or not the case sees a court room is irrelevant. The fact that someone has named in a lawsuit the victim, the parents of the victim and the deceased brother, who apparently committed suicide after the accident, is just about the most callous act I have ever heard of. This woman has already destroyed this family, and now she wants to take what little they have left. At the very least, the family will have to hire a lawyer, so even if the law suit doesn't go anywhere, she is still dumping more emotional and financial hardship on these people. Anyway, I hope she has an opportunity to explore the inner workings of an industrial meat grinder sometime soon.
 
12969644:theabortionator said:
I don't think that really matters in this case. Honestly either way it's the thought that counts on this one.

12969697:Mr.Huck said:
100% agree. Whether or not the case sees a court room is irrelevant. The fact that someone has named in a lawsuit the victim, the parents of the victim and the deceased brother, who apparently committed suicide after the accident, is just about the most callous act I have ever heard of. This woman has already destroyed this family, and now she wants to take what little they have left. At the very least, the family will have to hire a lawyer, so even if the law suit doesn't go anywhere, she is still dumping more emotional and financial hardship on these people. Anyway, I hope she has an opportunity to explore the inner workings of an industrial meat grinder sometime soon.

wut?

whether it sees a courtroom or not is completely relevant.

"cases" that dont have any "case" dont go to court.

people should get all up in arms IF this actually goes to court.

this wont go anywhere, and is just making the woman look like even more of a heartless goon.

but, and sadly, counter suing is pretty common stuff.

there is another incident taking place right now where an intoxicated man tried to leave a bar, when security stopped him and told him he could not drive, he punched one of the bouncers, got loose, ran off, got into his car, and on the way home hit and killed someone.

He is now suing the bar for LETTING HIM LEAVE INTOXICATED!

now imagine the security had of physically restrained this man. he would be suing for abuse. its ridiculous.

and as of right now, it looks like he is going to win.

also, sandy yatim. if you dont know about this case and how fucked up it is you should probably read into it.

to say "canada eh!, where people kill each other and sue each other"... is a tad on the ridiculous side no?

am i safe to assume that you have taken bath salts and successfully feasted on a living mans facial flesh, solely based on the fact that you live within the boarders of the united states??
 
12969790:seward said:
wut?

whether it sees a courtroom or not is completely relevant.

"cases" that dont have any "case" dont go to court.

In terms that there isn't really a shit ton of comfort in "Oh well at least it didn't go to trial, or at least they win" when you're dead kids are getting sued by the bitch that ran them over. That was what I was saying. Thought it was pretty straightforward.
 
12968934:timmi said:
On a side note: if someone jumps off a bridge to commit suicide, and hits your car. Are you just SOL and have to pay out of pocket?

I believe that if this happens you are sol unless you have the insurance that covers collision ( if its your fault.) I have been driving down a road and had my car struck by a rock that fell off the side of a cliff but the way it hit the insurance company said I hit the rock and because I didnt have collision it wasn't covered. That accident wrote my car off and I was left with nothing but a piece of junk.

Also on topic of the thread I personally agree timmis view it is the womans choice to sue if she really believes what she's saying. Personally not what I would do in the situation but it is still her choice to make.
 
12969790:seward said:
wut?

whether it sees a courtroom or not is completely relevant.

"cases" that dont have any "case" dont go to court.

people should get all up in arms IF this actually goes to court.

this wont go anywhere, and is just making the woman look like even more of a heartless goon.

but, and sadly, counter suing is pretty common stuff.

there is another incident taking place right now where an intoxicated man tried to leave a bar, when security stopped him and told him he could not drive, he punched one of the bouncers, got loose, ran off, got into his car, and on the way home hit and killed someone.

He is now suing the bar for LETTING HIM LEAVE INTOXICATED!

now imagine the security had of physically restrained this man. he would be suing for abuse. its ridiculous.

and as of right now, it looks like he is going to win.

also, sandy yatim. if you dont know about this case and how fucked up it is you should probably read into it.

to say "canada eh!, where people kill each other and sue each other"... is a tad on the ridiculous side no?

am i safe to assume that you have taken bath salts and successfully feasted on a living mans facial flesh, solely based on the fact that you live within the boarders of the united states??

See, I assume the legal system is fucked in the U.S. I didn't know it was that bad in Canada. It really doesn't surprise me when cases like this find there way into the courts. Blaming the entire legal system for shit like this is like blaming the trash truck because it smells bad. My anger is focused on the jackasses that sue.
 
12969813:theabortionator said:
In terms that there isn't really a shit ton of comfort in "Oh well at least it didn't go to trial, or at least they win" when you're dead kids are getting sued by the bitch that ran them over. That was what I was saying. Thought it was pretty straightforward.

12969857:Mr.Huck said:
See, I assume the legal system is fucked in the U.S. I didn't know it was that bad in Canada. It really doesn't surprise me when cases like this find there way into the courts. Blaming the entire legal system for shit like this is like blaming the trash truck because it smells bad. My anger is focused on the jackasses that sue.

i get it theabortionator. see my original comment where i said you can sue someone for whatever you want. i thought my point was also pretty straightforward.

i couldnt agree more.

shes a bad lady.

forsure.

but she does not represent the majority of canada nor the majority of Canadians moral reasoning.

im sure the only reason why this has really come to light is because it is pretty uncommon in canada.
 
And the lawyers fees to just fight off this lady..someone should start a kickstarter. Not that I'd contribute but people have rallied behind way less.
 
12970017:-benedetto said:

What exactly do we have to gain by drinking up all these terrible events and brewing up anger over something we have no control over?

It's like those police brutality videos on Youtube - the comments section is just people looking for reasons to get pissed off, and for what? The people who make those videos scour the internet for footage of horrible things and compile them to angry music so they can upload it to the internet and start angry conversations. It's rage porn - you people are just reveling in some superficial outlet to vent your pent up anger.

Yeah, it's terrible and worthy of discussion. But everyone scheming about what unusual punishment this or that person deserves is just masturbation.

tl;dr some of you are swine
 
12970069:lIllI said:
What exactly do we have to gain by drinking up all these terrible events and brewing up anger over something we have no control over?

It's like those police brutality videos on Youtube - the comments section is just people looking for reasons to get pissed off, and for what? The people who make those videos scour the internet for footage of horrible things and compile them to angry music so they can upload it to the internet and start angry conversations. It's rage porn - you people are just reveling in some superficial outlet to vent your pent up anger.

Yeah, it's terrible and worthy of discussion. But everyone scheming about what unusual punishment this or that person deserves is just masturbation.

tl;dr some of you are swine

And you gain what exactly by contributing to this website and thread? It's true that you are what you surround yourself with, I agree with that. But you pointing your finger at people doesn't help the situation
 
Back
Top