Camaro or challenger

=Worf=

=Worf=

Active member
i cant decide which i like better, i am leaning towards the challenger cause i can get it now, but ther eis just somthing about the camaro the enchants me. what is ns oopinion?
 
i feel the challenger captured the body lines of the late 60's challenger way better. the camaro is dope as fuck. but overall the challenger was designed best, i think even better than the new mustangs.
 
camaros will get you more girls, challengers will get you more bros.

when it comes to american muscle, it's not even about the power, it's about the sex. because we all know an audi would tear a chev apart any day.

i pick camaro.
 
'69 charger ftw

but yeah if the camaro comes with megan fox like said above, ill take that over a million dollars

 
neiher there both american peice's of shit. there is a long list of cars i would rather have that cost around the same amount of money.
 
1970DodgeChallengerHemi.jpg


can't beat that
 
CHALLENGER!!!!!!!

tho i think i heard somewhere that it is only being produced with an automatic this year........ tho maby it was the camaro i dont remember...... the article was in motor trend some months ago..... any way im a dodge person but that camaro in transformers ws dope!!!!!
 
haha well maybe in a drag you might win, but my dad won a race in his cutlass that ended up with watching it burn on the side of the road )= it caught on fire, he won the race, then pulled over and watched it die...too sad.

i love muscle ('cept mustangs), but you've got to admit the germans have been running the streets for a long time and a longer time to come.
 
motor trend reported chevy might be making an inline 4 cyl-turbo for the camaro hahahaha. hilarious. not trying to thread jack but anyone see the new hyundai genesis? my car is for sale right now and i will be picking one up this spring when it hits the U.S. 4 cyl-turbo rear wheel drive FTW. cant wait to get rid of wrong-wheel-drive!!!
 
say what you want but there is no alternative to true detroit muscle. my cutlass is still not quite were i want it (been spending money elsewhere as of late) but it still pushing close to 500 horses at the wheels
 
those are so sick looking, and turbo 4!!!i like em more than a big v8.

but id go with the camero, they look sick and are probally faster than shit.
 
word, my friends dad has a Viper GTS that pushes 1400 hp. he sets off car alarms when he cruises around at 40k. soooo dank.
 
actually they found a much better alternative, fred flinstone actually drove it in the original flinstones series

they actually have something even better than that too, and theyre called japanese cars, theyre light, similarly priced and can do something called turning, and dont blow head gaskets at 130k
 
and to the camaro or challenger, neither, they both manage to squeeze seemingly minimal amounts of power from huge displacement engines

go buy an m3 for similar cash
 
are you talking the 09 camaro and challenger or are you talking about the like 1970 challenger vs. 1969 camaro? i like the vintage muscle cars wayyy more and i would easily say challenger
 
yeah with twin turbos and for 130k, and it still cant corner

a 911 turbo will run you similar money, and makes almost 500 with half the displacement

and a gtr will run you 40k less, do 0-60 quicker and almost has the same top speed as a zr1
 
which is yet to be matched by chevy...

and if the boosted four pot rumor is true for the camaro, itll be the one out of the saturn sky redline, and 230hp aint bad, but with that cars curbweight yikes itll be a slouch, and its still a gm
 
that genesis is pretty awesome... r u talkin about fords mustang gt or jus the ford gt that they made in was 05? if its the second i thought thos were sorta dumb looking.... the mustang gt's are betta than either the challenger or camero and cheaper.... my friends brotha has a shellby gt 500 that thing is crazy.... to bad ford broke....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top