That was the worste article I have ever read. The best part was when they say
 "Seemingly hellbent on
a more toxic future, the administration will also allow industry to
treat 3 billion pounds of hazardous waste as "recycling" each year,
and to burn another 200 million pounds of hazardous waste
reclassified as "fuel,"".
Like, starting a sentence with "seemingly hellbent on a more toxic future", you know you are in for a treat.   Then "the administration" was dropped.  we all know who that refers to. hazardous waste?  What kind of hazardous waste.  This is extremely dependent on interpretation of details of this claim.
Now, I know that providing details is difficult while maintaining reader interest is difficult, but this article is really stupid.
I only looked at one sentence, but literally, it was one sentence.