Ohh absolutely I don't disagree with you.  I'm just saying that there is always more to a picture than the soundbites might lead you to believe, and an individual effort to change a particular aspect of electoral law may be legitimate.  Shit, I vote here and will continue to do so.
But if there is a comprehensive rationale behind a particular proposed policy, using sweeping generalizations like "war on voting" isn't really fair.  Why not address the policy on its own terms and win through reasoning, instead of trying to elicit a knee-jerk emotional reaction by glossing over details?
Also, this thread devolved into a pile of manure pretty darn quick.  The more things change, the more NSG stays the same.