Ban Skierman 2019

270on420out

Active member
INB4 “Hehe lol stupid kids don’t understand the Skierman”

He’s not even funny which is the only redeemable quality of trolls. All his posts are predictable and he promotes a negative image for the forums.

I have nothing against people who hold similar opinions to his.
 
14015554:Bitcoin said:
he isnt even the real skiierman

you played yourself.

skiierman doesnt break any rules, if you dont like him then ignore him, what is this 2004?
 
Thumbs down to this idea.

Skierman these days is like any cover band. Not as good as the original but gets the job done.
 
14015615:eheath said:
you played yourself.

skiierman doesnt break any rules, if you dont like him then ignore him, what is this 2004?

In order to ensure that this board is as helpful and enjoyable as possible to as many people as possible, we have established the following rules for this board. Any message may be removed if it:

Contains any form of discrimination based on race, gender, religion, national origin, physical or mental disability, sexual orientation or age. This includes words, abbreviations and slang which has a negative connotation.

Contains links to sexually explicit or offensive material

Contains blatant advertising for a company you work for. If you wish to advertise on Newschoolers.com, you must do so properly. Please contact dbishop@sportnet.com

Contains unwarranted and direct hate towards other members of the site

Have materials that wish to slander or hurt Newschoolers.com or their associates

Contains spam, which only intention is too further one’s post count

Contains information about deal-a-day websites. It is not your responsibility to pass on a good deal, as these threads only clog up the forums.

Contains any personal information of others which can violate privacy issues

Contains links to a site promotes the illegal downloads of ski industry material

Contains items which are trying to be "flipped". If you wish to make a profit, do so somewhere else please

Is deemed by us to be unsuitable for any reason whatsoever.

If we decide that a post is unacceptable, we will remove the post. Depending on the severity of the post or the past history of the user who made the post, we may drop a ban on your ass.

How many examples do you need for a ban? I can find 10 examples of him discriminating based on age.

How about

Contains unwarranted and direct hate towards other members of the site
 
14016275:DirtYStylE said:
How many examples do you need for a ban? I can find 10 examples of him discriminating based on age.

How about

Contains unwarranted and direct hate towards other members of the site

LOL age discrimination? are you kidding me? Good joke.

this other rule you have quoted is huge gray area, which is determined in each individual cases. We aren't going to ban people for calling out other people, talking shit, etc that has existed on NS since day one. If we actually enforced "no unwarranted and direct hate towards other members of the side" we wouldn't have a community anymore.

There are plenty of examples of us enforcing this rule against agregus offenders, including skiierman in the past.
 
14016281:eheath said:
LOL age discrimination? are you kidding me? Good joke.

this other rule you have quoted is huge gray area, which is determined in each individual cases. We aren't going to ban people for calling out other people, talking shit, etc that has existed on NS since day one. If we actually enforced "no unwarranted and direct hate towards other members of the side" we wouldn't have a community anymore.

There are plenty of examples of us enforcing this rule against agregus offenders, including skiierman in the past.

imagine banning someone for sh*t talking but still having a top sh*t talkers ranking lol
 
Ban Dogfart for not changing his name and bitching to the mods to delete threads.

A man has only two things: this cock and his word.

Dogfart has neither.
 
But when was the last time he was banned? Maybe OP is just sayin—come on. For old time’s sake.

Or is it a signof the times. Skierman is losing his edge. Not as good as the original.

Shame on all of NS
 
14016281:eheath said:
LOL age discrimination? are you kidding me? Good joke.

this other rule you have quoted is huge gray area, which is determined in each individual cases. We aren't going to ban people for calling out other people, talking shit, etc that has existed on NS since day one. If we actually enforced "no unwarranted and direct hate towards other members of the side" we wouldn't have a community anymore.

There are plenty of examples of us enforcing this rule against agregus offenders, including skiierman in the past.

How many chromosomes do you have? The rule specifically includes age discrimination so either take the rule down or ban skiierman.
 
Skierman is funny. The dumb shit he posts isn't but somehow despite everyone knowing he's a low effort troll he still manages to rustle the fuck out of y'alls jimmies on a regular basis. And that is hilarious.
 
14016396:-eREKTion- said:
Skierman is funny. The dumb shit he posts isn't but somehow despite everyone knowing he's a low effort troll he still manages to rustle the fuck out of y'alls jimmies on a regular basis. And that is hilarious.

Good to see some people understand, people who yell ban skiierman are the ones fueling him. If everyone just shut their fucking mouths, we wouldn't have a problem :)
 
I still think he is Tanner Hall and that is why NS admins put up with him. Even how pissy he got about being critical of Tanners kicking horse run. Tanner even said, "Boom Bomb Connect" at the end of his LowPressure Podcast which is the exact quote of SatanWorshipper's reply when I called Skierman out. The podcast was recorded at Kicking horse right after the event when we were making comments and he probably was on NS and read the quote. No Joke.

929529.jpeg
http://lowpressurepodcast.com/125-tanner-hall-the-catalyst-is-skiing/

1:05:00- "Boom Bomb Connect..."
 
14016510:SuspiciousFish said:
I still think he is Tanner Hall and that is why NS admins put up with him. Even how pissy he got about being critical of Tanners kicking horse run. Tanner even said, "Boom Bomb Connect" at the end of his LowPressure Podcast which is the exact quote of SatanWorshipper's reply when I called Skierman out. The podcast was recorded at Kicking horse right after the event when we were making comments and he probably was on NS and read the quote. No Joke.

View attachment 929529
http://lowpressurepodcast.com/125-tanner-hall-the-catalyst-is-skiing/

1:05:00- "Boom Bomb Connect..."

Considering Tanner’s current mellow and “wise” kinda demeanor nowadays I have a hard time believing he would be as angry as skierman, although this theory does have merit to it
 
14016281:eheath said:
LOL age discrimination? are you kidding me? Good joke.

this other rule you have quoted is huge gray area, which is determined in each individual cases. We aren't going to ban people for calling out other people, talking shit, etc that has existed on NS since day one. If we actually enforced "no unwarranted and direct hate towards other members of the side" we wouldn't have a community anymore.

There are plenty of examples of us enforcing this rule against agregus offenders, including skiierman in the past.

So sparknotes: eheath is a huge cocksucker and will probably ban me for this post because he's a dumbass. But yet skierman and Everlast will live on.
 
14016510:SuspiciousFish said:
I still think he is Tanner Hall and that is why NS admins put up with him. Even how pissy he got about being critical of Tanners kicking horse run. Tanner even said, "Boom Bomb Connect" at the end of his LowPressure Podcast which is the exact quote of SatanWorshipper's reply when I called Skierman out. The podcast was recorded at Kicking horse right after the event when we were making comments and he probably was on NS and read the quote. No Joke.

View attachment 929529
http://lowpressurepodcast.com/125-tanner-hall-the-catalyst-is-skiing/

1:05:00- "Boom Bomb Connect..."

sorry dude but i assure you skiierman 1000% is not tanner hall hahaha
 
14016602:buyfulltilts said:
Considering Tanner’s current mellow and “wise” kinda demeanor nowadays I have a hard time believing he would be as angry as skierman, although this theory does have merit to it

You try quitting drinking and see how calm you stay.
 
14016913:skierman said:
You try quitting drinking and see how calm you stay.

Utilitarianism is the theory that the best action to take is the one that provides the most good for the most people; but utilitarianism requires that everybody be on the same page morally... Be your own moral compass.
 
We need at LowPressurePodcast or a PowellMovement interview with Skierman. He is kind of like Herpes, its uncomfortable when it pops up but is an important reminder of rowdy times past.
 
14016986:skierman said:
Hi, welcome to the real world where your view of "popularity" through a pointless voting system doesn't matter. The sad part is, you're not pretending to be so fucking pathetic.

C'mon, you can do better than that mang.
 
14016602:buyfulltilts said:
Considering Tanner’s current mellow and “wise” kinda demeanor nowadays I have a hard time believing he would be as angry as skierman, although this theory does have merit to it

His public demeanor is calm because he vents his anger out through skierman
 
Back
Top