B-dog on full tilt

Heres hoping this get kids to go and get fitted instead of ordering online then complaning about their badly fitting boots.
 
402646_10150627981482774_72167857773_10969951_2056570394_n.jpg
 
Getting them fitted properly is worth it. Trust me, boots that don't fit suck, and FT provide a solution with the intuition liner.
 
"We don’t pay skiers to ride our boots; even pros you see rocking our boots, like Seth Morrison, Tom Wallisch, and any number of Olympic freestyle skiers, are on our boots simply because it gives them a performance advantage over people that ride conventional overlap boots or weak copies of our original 3-Piece designs.

Of course, if you’re one of the hard working skiers at the pro level on podiums or star in pro ski films we may consider sending you a pair to give you the advantage needed to kick even more butt."

Its hard to believe they don't pay T-wall, just seeing as how his name is on their boot, Seth too. But that's straight off the Full Tilt website...
 
B-dog needs to get picked up by Jiberish, then to every kid who was like "zomg t wally", Fuck t-wall. B-dog is the in thing.
 
are full tilts better than spks then? yes i know bootfitter. and if i bought new boots i of course would. but its seems like all the pros are moving to full tilt from salomon.
 
Even though i really don't care who's with who etc, I was sure one day Casabon would be with FT. FT recruit skiers who wear "stylish" gear which all kids buy and fulltilt's design is oriented to attract many new kids. I also know FT is good product !
 
In my opinion the FT 3-piece design is old and outdated. The spk was built for park, and for me it works miracles. It's so much more comfortable and lines up with my shin better. Also, rubber toe piece=no toe bang. But my friend loves his drop kicks, so it really just depends on what fits you better.
 
The rubber toe is a dumb fix. FTs and other 3 piece boots actually retain your foot and keep it from sliding forward and getting for bang.
 
well seth didn't have a boot sponsor for the longest time until full tilt got going because he was using all of the old flexons that he had collected. Im sure he could have gotten a pretty profitable boot sponsor in that time but instead he choose to stick with the rachlies. I do agree its odd that he doesnt get paid now, but im also not that surprised
 
anyone else think that they're used boots? Did he paint them or did the shop paint em? I really don't think a shop would paint boots. But they def look painted.
 
Why Do you think it's outdated? If something works, and has been amazing for the past 30 years, then why change it? If a design is already proven the be amazing, why fuck with it? Also, I am digging the blue and grey coat
 
Then don't get plastic buckles? I haven't broken my metal buckles, the spring is all screwy on one, but it doesn't bother me
 
So I should just reply to clear things up. B Dog has been in SPKs up until the other day when I fit him, yes he has tried them once or twice before but needed the help of FT sensei Ryan Rubino to get him locked. When you press the shit out of an entire run and start it all off with a nollie you gotta make sure your locked in youre boots. The FT 3 piece design is leaps and bounds a better design than that bucket of a boot called the SPK. Although its true that the best boot is going to be the one that fits your foot shape the best. I fit Bdog in a 26.5 Dogger with the standard 6flex tongue. He sprayed it black. And we are all stoked that we could make it happen for him.
 
I'd pay out the ass for a black and white boot.

Also inb4 every kid in the US has the hot doggers in that exact size
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top