Are 180s steezier than quad corks

14060591:HintsHoused said:
I really hoped I wouldn't face any kind of college essay as soon as I graduate from school. But no, essay is a mandatory course for freshmen. Sigh. I'm loyal customerhttps://samedayessay.com service for at least a year. I know I’m not the best when it comes to explaining things. Thanks for your help and responsiveness!

14060592:HintsHoused said:
I really hoped I wouldn't face any kind of college essay as soon as I graduate from school. But no, essay is a mandatory course for freshmen. Sigh. I'm loyal customerhttps://samedayessay.com service for at least a year. I know I’m not the best when it comes to explaining things. Thanks for your help and responsiveness!

Cool friggin story man
 
The cool thing about skiing is you can make it how you want and make tricks like fat 180s look as dope as a big quad cork or something idk. Its all how you approach it. Like yeah sure a 180 on a little sidehit isn't that impressive but a huge 180 safety with maybe a little shifty in there will always look clean off of cliffs.
 
14060654:DeebieSkeebies said:
The cool thing about skiing is you can make it how you want and make tricks like fat 180s look as dope as a big quad cork or something idk. Its all how you approach it. Like yeah sure a 180 on a little sidehit isn't that impressive but a huge 180 safety with maybe a little shifty in there will always look clean off of cliffs.

Way I see it if someone were to 180 chads gap it would look smooth af, if someone were to quad cork it it would be impressive but would probably look sloppy
 
Steeze literally means “style and ease”. Like no shit someone can make the easiest spin in skiing look easy. Especially when you’re comparing it to one of the most technically difficult tricks.

It’s when someone makes a difficult trick look easy that I get stoked.
 
Its subjective a lot of comp jocks wouldn’t say anything less than a 5 is “steezy” but personally I think if you hit it just right and land a 1 or a 3 with ease it could be the steeziest shit. Also I think any trick looks dope when it’s not in the park

like Evan a 270 onto a simple urban feature looks dope, shit a 50/50 can even look “steezy” if it’s on the right feature
 
It depends on how the trick is executed. Go watch the dubs in Realtime, they were tech-y as fuck back then but they weren’t grabbed that well or tweaked at all. Now some of the heaviest tricks I see are dubs or some of Henriks triples. That shit can be steezy if done right. Eventually there will be some banger quads.
 
14060656:leanmaster said:
Way I see it if someone were to 180 chads gap it would look smooth af, if someone were to quad cork it it would be impressive but would probably look sloppy

This. Right trick for the right feature is a huge part of what makes a trick respectable IMO
 
Back
Top