ar5 or phil belangers

X

XtRemE11

Active member
Whats the difference between them. Ive heard the phil belangers have really weak edges. I ski park 30% of the time and moguls 30% of the time and everything else 30%. I think im probably gonna get the ar5's but i still want to know what the pb's are like.

 
the belangers are good skis as long as you dont do rails. the edges will fall apart fast and they wont warranty them. if you do rails get the ar5 if you dont get the belangers.

 
what about the last 10%?

Never shall innocent blood be shed, yet the blood of the wicked shall flow like a river. The Three shall spread their blackened wings and be the vengeful striking hammer of God.

 
yeah i do rails alot but i heard the pb's have stronger edges than the trouble makers is this true? And other than the edges whats the differences? and the extra 10 percent is powder.

 
dynastar has apparently fixed the edge problem to a degree for this years models. also, the topsheet doesnt scratch as much as last years'. this is just what i have heard.

'your friends hate you, plain and simple, your a loser man, but your in luck, wal mart has a half off sale for ropes going on, and for an extra dollar theyll tie the knouse for you' - Ds91260

 
you should look at different skis than those two. the pistols suprisingly ski really well all around. and check out line's new skis there sick. FAT skis are better.

 
Im getting a seperate pair of skis for powder so i want something other than a fat ski that will be good in moguls.

 
i know that the pbs also have fiberglass for added stiffness. I am torn between TMs or PBs

If The women don't find you handsome... atleast they will find you handy

(Red Green)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top