APO Starsky. First thoughts

last_tango

Active member
So I noticed that there is little info on apo skis and I'd figure I put out a first thoughts of the apo starsky I bought. I plan on putting out a full review at some point with pics in the review section. I'm also looking for pointers on how to write a good reviews.

I'm 5'11 and 190lbs type 3 skier and I'm riding the 179's that measure out to be 175. For bindings I'm riding on salomon s914s(driver toe)

Looks and quality: APO puts out a very well made product. It comes out of the factory with a stone grind. They pressed the skis with care, there is no variences in how the fiberglass is pressed, its all in a smooth consistent press. The same goes for the sidewall.

The graphics for the ski are pretty damn weird. I personally like the red and blue color combo but the graphics are so farfetched that the artist was definitely on something. A couple of stickers are gonna be slapped on it.

Feel and ride: The starsky is a stiffer ski and feels very stable when ridding. They felt very stable on landing of jumps. For a stiff ski with a considerable amount of camber camber I suspect the ski to have a ton of pop but I did not get that feel at all. The starsky currently to me rides like 2by4s. I think this will change after I break them in when the tails of the skis will give in a little bit more and allow me to load up on them and pop. The starsky also felt a little bit sluggish to turn over at low speed but at speed felt stable. The starsky definitely prefers to go fast.

Overall: I suspected the starsky to be a 90waist all mountain park tool but right now they feel very dull and lacks spring in its step. I'm not sure it will end up being like that for long once I break in the stiffness of the ski. I can count on the starsky for lasting me a while cause you can tell that apo puts out a quality built product as far as construction goes.

Please throw pointers out on how I wrote this. Thanks everyone in advance. Also can describe more if needed.
 
Nice job,

Things that stood out to me:

Who cares that you are type 3, tell us your style, playful vs charger, etc

Tell us how many days you skied them and where

Tell us where you mounted the bindings

Quality stuff doesn't need to be that long if there is nothing wrong, basically tell us if there is a problem but if they are just another pair of well made skis don't worry about it.

Compare stiffness to other skis

camber camber

Of course it is a 90mm waist park tool but is it a good one?

cause?

Can you really already tell it is going to last?

Anyway nice job, I am not trying to put you down at all but rather to help you out, by pointing out your what I saw I am not trying to say that I would do any better but rather point out what I noticed. I am stoked that you are writing reviews, skiing needs more reviews. For NS this is a great review, If you really want to work on writing good reviews check out Blister gear review, they write some of the best reviews I have ever written,

Hope this helps.
 
Thanks man this is exactly what im looking for. Im trying hard to put out info on apo. I even emailed apo and i got no response and that was after waiting two weeks.
 
glad to be of any assistance, I would also love to learn more about apo, I feel like there are not many reviews of their stuff out there.
 
Definitely not a ton, but the Sammy C is a damn good ski, love mine. https://www.newschoolers.com/ns/content/reviews/action/read/id/1817/
 
Back
Top