Anything OVER 100 is pussy shit

14265500:Treegrabber said:
[tag=273397]@WoFlowz[/tag]

The kid that made this thread is a complete pussy and prolly has weak ass knees, cases every jump and beats his girl. He can go suck some more of safety patrols dick while his 86underfoot skis slap his ass.
 
Damn I’m gonna be telling my grandkids who are skiing 140 waisted skis in the park hey young lad back in my day we thought 100 mm SKIS WERE FAT! HAH!
 
14265784:Mattbrippin said:
Why tho wide skis got a purpose skinny ski got its purpose since when has there been beef over ski width?

Because there is literally no point of a ski under 100mm underfoot unless your racing with modern the r&d done in modern skis

**This post was edited on Mar 26th 2021 at 11:49:56am
 
Saw some pussy riding on3ps dressed like Joss at xgames, at the top of a cornice. Rode past him and charged fat down this shit in the vishnus. Made sure to call him the n-word as I mentally unraveled him with my steez what a pussy.
 
I really enjoy riding my stockli stormrider 88's in the powder. They use more energy cuz heavy sinkers, but once you develop the right body strength, it's lit.

There's a certain satisfaction of thrashing your skinnys through the deep and leaving a trench in your wake.

If it's mixed conditions, it's nice to have your edge transition seamlessly between fluff and chop. It all feels the same under you.

Personally, I don't like it when my pow skis lunch tray in the chunder. Forgoe-ing float is worth the trade off for me.
 
14265816:Chunkylover said:
I really enjoy riding my stockli stormrider 88's in the powder. They use more energy cuz heavy sinkers, but once you develop the right body strength, it's lit.

There's a certain satisfaction of thrashing your skinnys through the deep and leaving a trench in your wake.

If it's mixed conditions, it's nice to have your edge transition seamlessly between fluff and chop. It all feels the same under you.

Personally, I don't like it when my pow skis lunch tray in the chunder. Forgoe-ing float is worth the trade off for me.

Based and skinnypilled
 
At Snowbird my daily is a 106, any pow and I bring out the Magic Js. I'd love to have an in between option, but I just didn't get it this year.
 
I miss the good ol days when pros hit backcountry jumps with 80mm full camber park skis and every rail at the mountain was 5ft off the ground minimum.
 
Deep pow is pointless if you're gonna float right on the surface... JJ's when you get a dusting, 68mm mogul skis when it gets deep.
 
14266104:jompcock said:
Deep pow is pointless if you're gonna float right on the surface... JJ's when you get a dusting, 68mm mogul skis when it gets deep.

Anything more than 12" and I'm wearing ice skates
 
14265625:sullivanobrien_ said:
he uses the arv 86 and edollo interchangeably

no its part of his sponsor contract to pose with the skis every now and then for insta. Sorta like how you see ahall choking down a rockstar on his insta.
 
14265816:Chunkylover said:
I really enjoy riding my stockli stormrider 88's in the powder. They use more energy cuz heavy sinkers, but once you develop the right body strength, it's lit.

There's a certain satisfaction of thrashing your skinnys through the deep and leaving a trench in your wake.

If it's mixed conditions, it's nice to have your edge transition seamlessly between fluff and chop. It all feels the same under you.

Personally, I don't like it when my pow skis lunch tray in the chunder. Forgoe-ing float is worth the trade off for me.

I got stormrider 88s , and I’ll take my 118 yle in the steep chundery chutes pow or not over my storm riders any day, and they are surfboards but I can control my wide skis and I love surfin snow, I like my narrow skis for when they’re appropriate, but powder days are not the time
 
Back
Top