Anyone that smokes american spirits

RockNRollNghtClb

Active member
I used to smoke them here and there, no wonder I've been fiending for a pack. Guess i cant pull the 'na bro they're spirits they're not as bad for you because they're all natural

http://whyfiles.org/183smoking/2.html No wonder

Crack nicotine

What may be the most dangerous additive of all -- by reinforcing the addiction with a deadly stronghold -- is nicotine itself, says James Pankow of Oregon Health and Science University in Portland. Nicotine occurs naturally in tobacco, but cigarette manufacturers have banked on nicotine's allure by encouraging a form known as "free-base" nicotine in the final product.
free_base.gif


Nicotine, Pankow explains, occurs naturally in tobacco plants as either an acid or a base. The acidic form is more stable, and therefore more concentrated. The basic form, known as "free-base" nicotine, is volatile, especially when smoked. As a result, it is absorbed quickly and efficiently into the lungs when a person smokes, where it quickly reaches the brain. Acidic nicotine, conversely, clings to the particles of smoke as they settle into the lungs, and is slowly absorbed before it is transported to the brain.

The difference, Pankow says, is analogous to the difference between powder and crack cocaine, the latter of which is smoked in a similar free-base form and is considered to be the most addictive form of the drug.

Tobacco companies have learned how to maximize the amount of free-base nicotine in commercial cigarettes by carefully blending different tobacco varieties and by directly converting the existing acidic nicotine into the free-base form. The result, researchers think, is a more addictive, and thus more deadly, cigarette.

"In the 1990s, the courts demanded the release of tobacco company documents, which are now available. There's much about converting more nicotine into the freebase form to get more nicotine into the smoke and so that the nicotine in the smoke becomes more available," says Pankow.

american_spirit.jpg


Pankow and his team recently compared the levels of free-base nicotine found in the most common brands of American cigarettes (see "Percent Free Base Nicotine.." in the bibliography). They found that some -- including the famously popular Marlboro -- contain 10 to 20 times higher percentages of free-base nicotine than other brands. But the brand with the most free-base nicotine? The "Natural American Spirit" cigarette, marketed hereas "100% Chemical Additive-Free Tobacco." American Spirit cigarettes contain 36 percent free-base nicotine, compared with 9.6 percent in a Marlboro, 2.7 percent in a Camel, and 6.2 percent in a Winston.

Nicotine for health nuts?

As most conscientious consumers know by now, the all-natural label doesn't always translate to all-healthy. But as anti-tobacco ads flood the airwaves and health warnings abound, the market for "alternative" cigarettes is swelling noticeably. Enter the era of the concerned smoker, who passes up additive-laden cigarettes issued by corporate giants in favor of "clean" tobacco.

In response, a whole new crop of products has emerged from the tarpool. American Spirit is one of them. As for the rest, take your pick:

bidi.jpg
bullet3.gif
Bidis are the groovy hand-rolled cigarettes from India, popular with teens because they are manufactured in a variety of flavors, like strawberry or root beer. But buyer beware: A study released published last December in the journal Nicotine and Tobacco Research found that after smoking bidis, study participants' blood nicotine levels were higher than when they smoked conventional brands.

bullet3.gif
"Welcome to the world of nicotine-free smoking!" is the plug for Quest Cigarettes, a cigarette that is available in three nicotine levels, "low," "extralow," and "nicotine-free," intended for smokers who want to cut back or eliminate cigarettes entirely. Unlike nicotine-replacement strategies, Quest cigarettes give smokers a chance to hang onto the habit while kicking the addiction. But many studies have shown that when smokers switch to cigarettes with less nicotine, they simply (and probably unconsciously) take deeper, longer drags to get the familiar buzz.

bullet3.gif
Philip Morris is testing a high-tech cigarette called the Accord. The $40 kit includes a battery charger, a puff-activated lighter that holds the cigarette, and a carton of special cigarettes. When a smoker sucks on the little box (which could pass for a kazoo), a microchip ignites the cigarette. The process gives the smoker one drag and releases no ashes or smoke. Accord appears to reduce the risk of secondhand smoke, but a study published late last year reported that Accord smokers took bigger and longer puffs than with conventional cigarettes. The researchers concluded that the Accord is unlikely to reduce the smoker's risk.

eclipse.jpg
Less tar, more carbon monoxide. Is this alternative cigarette a real alternative?

bullet3.gif
R.J. Reynolds' Eclipse cigarette heats tobacco rather than burning it. When users light the cigarette-like tube, heated glycerin and tobacco vaporize the nicotine. The process produces less tar, but more carbon monoxide (see "Long-term effects of the Eclipse cigarette..." in the bibliography).

So far, tobacco companies have succeeded in stalling legislation that would require them to disclose -- or even test for -- the amount of free-base nicotine or other additives in their products. "They have always argued these are trade secrets... but we're not talking about making software. This is a product that kills," says Pankow. In the meantime, he says, smokers should be wary of claims that link alternative cigarettes to better health.

Who's in a puff over passive smoking?





There are 1 2 3 4 pages in this feature.

Bibliography | Credits | Feedback | Search

©2003, University of Wisconsin, Board of Regents.

 
Ah fuck I meant to say my rectum. No it's looks like I smoke rectum. I DO NOT SMOKE RECTUM. Just weiner
 
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/33pis-u819w" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
Well shit. I don't smoke ciggabutts, but the good old spirit goes into all my spliffs and the occasional mole. No bueno
 
My girlfriend's pop can't eat solid food in his 50s because of throat cancer. I'm sure he'd love to have the debate about which cigs are worst.
 
So, to be clear OP, you're surprised that you're craving nicotine now, after smoking American Spirits, because you were under the impression that American Spirits were non addictive because they're natural? Am I understanding this correctly?
 
This article is from 2003. Not saying it's innacurate or anything, but alot of legislation can pass in the tobacco industry in 10 years so just keep that in mind.

I prefer to smoke anus though
 
coming from someone who smokes cigarettes, you're smoking cigarettes anyways. It's almost useless to be worried about it because it'll kill us all anyways.
 
ive smoked probably 12 in my life, and yes I am surprised to find that spirits have more than triple the amount of nicotine than most cigarettes
 
When I smoke I smoke Camel Filters because they are the only cheap cig that doesn't have crack nicotine.
 
Damn, I really need to get new tobbacco for my spliffs and moles now. I'm gon' get addicted to freebase nicotine
 
Back
Top