4frnt turbo vs line sir francis bacon

[Flying_Bear]

hey guys what ski do you think is better? im 6 foot 200 lbs im moving out to sacramento so i will have my first season at tahoe. so i want something i can take anywhere. i dont really ride park that much so i dont need to worry about that.

 

[Casual.]

Dat bacon. Actually you will be happy with either.

 

[Bpaddock]

Turbo for sure

 

[Session]

Aside from the waist width these ski's have zero characteristics in common. The SFB is jibby while the turbo is more of a hate fucking charger. How do you want to ski?

People that blindly recommend one or the other are idiots.

 

[Barmski]

turbo is like a big msp. sfb is more all around. Decide what u want first then go from there. Turbo is def a charger.

 

[BskiP]

They are completely different. Super soft ski with a rocker on the tip and tail versus a stiffer ski with early rise in the tip and tail. I rode the turbo about 80 days last season, basically whenever i wasnt riding park, and it does it all. I railed that ski, jumped it, flipped it, sent anything i wanted to on it. One of the most versatile all mountain skis you can find. If you like a softer ski, the bacon might be fun, but how does anyone ride soft skis aggressively? that cant be that fun.

 

[dprice21]

bacon

 

[Montana_Hoodrat]

I love my bacons. So damn easy to land in pow.

 

[philskier]

Turbos are a better all around everyday ski and Bacon's are more of a powder specific ski. Both are def good choices!

 

[Dr.Newschoolers]

definitely gear talk