4frnt STL vs. Armada AR6

[R.L.]

what you think is better for mostly park and somethimes bc ??

 

[ShrdGnar]

IM not to shure about the 4frnts but the ar6's have definitly been doin it for me

 

[R.L.]

anybody here who ride the 4frnt or the armada??

 

[jhackbeez]

i ride the stl's and they should be fine in powder. alot of pro's use the stl and tnk for backcountry booters so it must be alright. ive skiied my 177's in pow and they were fine.

 

[skiRay]

ar6 for sure

 

[ski_ENDUB]

deffinitely armada, i haven't heard very good things about 4frnt

 

[skierkid_92]

go for the armada ar6's there a good all mountain ski this year

 

[hardey]

i had the ar5 last year (think it's really similar to the ar6) and have the 4frnt stl now, the stl is a lot better for park in my opinion and softer than the ar6. In pow i have no idea, haven't the chance yet to ride the stl in pow but i think for little bit bc it will work, ar6 worked.

 

[LOVELL]

armada is shit there no good

 

[sneaky]

any reasons or just a broad general feeling about the company as a whole??

 

[lyndon]

I wouldnt say that, but I slightly agree.

Im not a hard skier, and Ive gone through 2 sets of Armadas in under 2 seasons. Hwoever, they back thier product up with a great warranty system, so its a toss up.

Both would be great skis, I would just go with whichever you can get cheaper.

 

[jahmin44]

i think the ar6's are quite a bit softer than the ar5

 

[RJD2]

pm ohioskier45 ... He has had both the ar6 and the STL and is very helpful with ski information