4frnt bindings or look?

[+public_ennemy+]

i hesitate a lot on bindings, i got 2 choices:

-1rst: 4frnt witch are sick and cost like 350$ can

-2nd: dynastar look or ross. scratch witch are ok and are 200$

what would you take, and if any of you tried them give me your advice and what you think of them, like or frnt better?? thx

 

[aznpcskier]

how are looks ok? cause they aren't as core and maybe don't look as cool?  personallyt looks have never failed me and are amazing.  I haven't heard much about 4frnt bindings but being that I have never had a bad experience with look and they're cheaper I'd go with the looks.

 

[[~_~]]

I have never ridden a binding better than Looks. 4FRNTs suck butt.

 

[Balastik]

Personaly I love the 2004/2005 rossignol axial bindings, they are just all around super good bindings . In fact i love them so much i bought 3 pairs last year.. and i dont even have skis for them.

 

[Swick825]

how do you guys say 4frnt sucks butt. most of you are too cheap or obsessed with looks or salomons to try them. they are good fucking bindings.

 

[Ryanvdonk]

word, you try and find a metal binding with a din up to 16 that retails for 250.

 

[scratchproteen]

never tried 4frnt...

but am in love with Looks my p10's have had 3 seasons and work perfectly

 

[kabozo101]

go with the looks

 

[AhrenStein]

if you buy 4frnt bindings ur a fag... go with look

 

[[~_~]]

I just bought some Rossi FKS 155 for that price.

 

[anomericas]

I've heard the 4frnt bindings are pretty good man, I'm not sure what you're talking about.