TheDetectives
Member
im pretty set on the devastators they're perfect, but im wondering about how odd it would be to ride a 108 65% of the time in the park
108 TOO FAT?
- Thread starter TheDetectives
- Start date
tomPietrowski
Active member
It will come down to how you ski th park. You won't be doing the bigger tricks I a ski that fat but you could do a lot of jibby stuff fine. So if you are looking to really progress in th park it may not be a good choice but if you are more about having fun out of the park and some chill laps in te park go for it. It can also be good if you want to take tricks to powder. Abma ride rocker 108's in the park last season as it made the jump up to the rocker 122 for powder less of a change.
skier58284
Active member
If you weigh 108 you are too fat
On topic, my daily drivers are 117s. I don't ski park but they're fine on groomers and even bumps unless the conditions suck (i.e. it has been 40 degrees and no snow for two weeks).
On topic, my daily drivers are 117s. I don't ski park but they're fine on groomers and even bumps unless the conditions suck (i.e. it has been 40 degrees and no snow for two weeks).
last_tango
Active member
Where are you skiing? If its on nothing but ice on the ice coast its going to be on the hefty side. Im thinking of tight ass trees with moguls. I found out east most of the time a 95ish waist wasnt hindering to roll over on edge but felt stable. Also will the rocker profile fit for what you will be skiing? I personally can't stand any rocker on ice.
