Search results

just found this on google... any body know more about them http://alpineskishop.blogspot.com/2009/01/full-tilt-seth-morrison-model-2010.html

d-structure.com have some

Invaders are awesome skis for the price... the base and edge on the tail of one of mine ended up delaming at the end of the season.. line have replaced it under warranty... I beat on them pretty hard so I'm stoked

Yeah they are defiantly ahead by 8mm had them mounted with the graphics flipped and they are the same on both so it real obvious…… didn’t buy the skis or the bindings from the shop had the mount at.... Probably will end up just having the toes moved back.... hmmm

So I’m confused... When I put my boot in the binding the midsol of the boot is ahead of the of midsol marked on the ski by about 5mm may be more.... did the ski shop f-up my mount or can some one explain why It’s ahead of the line marked on the ski....

Elizabeth’s are good fun on groomed runs coz of there small side cut radius. It defiantly more of a all mountain ski compared with the 130s… they are both gonna suck in bumps!

http://www.freeskier.co.nz/powder/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=79&Itemid=56

I got regular brakes on a 86mm still work and look way better than having a brake that will fit 100mm waist ski.

I agree for your height and weight go for the Lizzies. But you say you want to use it for skiing bumps I think both of them suck in the bumps just to wide.

Dynastar owns look and lange. Rossignol buys the technology from them